Search Weight Loss Topics:

Page 1,319«..1020..1,3181,3191,3201,321..1,3301,340..»

Doctors call on workplaces to ban sale of sugary drinks – The Guardian

Posted: October 28, 2019 at 9:41 pm

Doctors have called on workplaces to ban sales of sugary drinks after research showed that removing them from cafes, canteens and vending machines helped reduce peoples waistlines and improve their health.

Researchers monitored more than 200 staff at the University of California in San Francisco and its associated hospital after a ban was introduced in 2015. Before the ban, the participating staff consumed on average more than a litre of sugary drinks daily, but 10 months later had slashed their intake by nearly half.

Medical assessments of the staff found they had lost an average of more than 2cm around the waist, and that those who reduced their sugary drink intake tended to have better insulin resistance and lower cholesterol.

A simple sales ban has meaningful effects on employees health, said Elissa Epel, a professor of psychiatry who led the work. This is very exciting news, because to eliminate sales of sugary beverages is something any institution can do. The ban was only on sales and did not prevent people from bringing sugary drinks to work, or buying them off-site.

Beyond investigating the impact of the sales ban itself, Epel randomly assigned half of the staff to also receive a motivational intervention. This involved showing them how much sugar they were consuming for example, one sugary drink per day was equivalent to a plastic cup half full of sugar cubes. The staff were also given information on how sugar harms health and were helped to identify reasons they might want to adopt a healthier lifestyle.

Eating too much sugar contributes to people having too many calories during the day, which can lead to weight gain. Being overweight increases the risk of health problems such as heart diseases, type 2 diabetes, and some forms of cancer. Sugar is also one of the main causes of tooth decay.

The NHS advises that most adults and children in the UK eat too much of a type of sugar called 'free sugars'. These are the sugars added to food and drinks, found in biscuits, chocolate, breakfast cereals and fizzy drinks. But they are also found naturally in honey and unsweetened fruit juices.

The UK governments recommendation is that these 'free sugars' should not make up more than 5% of the calories you have every day. That is still quite a lot of sugar - it equates to seven sugar cubes worth for an adult. But bear in mind that one can of a fizzy drink can include the equivalent of 9 cubes of sugar. Children under 4 should avoid all sugar-sweetened drinks and food with added 'free sugars' in it.

Martin Belam

According to the report in the journal Jama Internal Medicine, sugary drink intake fell 49% on average. The sales ban alone allowed staff to cut their sugary drinks by 23% (246ml) daily. But the intervention had a greater impact, prompting staff to reduce their intake by 73% (762ml) daily.

We found that for people with overweight or obesity, if they also got the brief counselling discussion, they showed significant reductions in their lipid levels as well. So for heavier people, the extra attention really mattered to them. They benefited the most, said Epel.

Laura Schmidt, a co-author of the study, said the permanent ban on sugary drinks sales at UCSF was an obvious move. These days, most of what we are treating in our healthcare system is chronic diseases, such as diabetes, heart disease, cancers and Alzheimers. All of these conditions can be linked back to the calorie-dense, nutritionally poor standard western diet, she said. It made sense for a health sciences campus like UCSF to say no to profiting off the sales of products that cause the very diseases we treat in our hospitals and clinics.

Aseem Malhotra, an NHS consultant cardiologist and professor of evidence-based medicine, said: This latest research not only solidifies the evidence that the positive health impact of sugar reduction is independent of body weight, but that removing the sale of sugary drinks from the working environment is a key solution to combating diet-related disease amongst staff.

Its an absolute scandal that our hospitals have become a branding opportunity for the junk food industry and not surprising that more than 50% of healthcare staff are now overweight or obese. If we truly want to reverse obesity and its associated diseases we must stop selling sickness in the hospital grounds.

Simon Stevens, the NHS chief executive, said: Since the NHS first asked hospitals to reduce sales of sugary drinks we have removed over 32 million teaspoons of sugar or the equivalent of around 900,000 cans of fizzy pop.

Obesity is a dangerous public health threat, leading to a string of serious illnesses for millions, with thousands of people ending up in hospital as a result, so every industry needs to take a look at what it can do to support urgent action like reducing sales of sugary drinks to prevent harm and safeguard children.

Read more:
Doctors call on workplaces to ban sale of sugary drinks - The Guardian

Giant pandas: Saving the giant panda from extinction – 60 Minutes – CBS News

Posted: October 28, 2019 at 9:41 pm

Chinese call them "xiongmao," meaning, "bear that looks like a cat." The adjective they use is "meng" which translates, "cute like a baby." Until recently, the giant panda was on its way to extinction. But then, it was saved by its one evolutionary advantage: it's adorable. In 2016, the panda's conservation status was upgraded from endangered to just vulnerable. Because the giant panda is China's national symbol, the Chinese have worked four decades to perfect breeding the bears in captivity. They've achieved one of the biggest successes in conservation, but there is more work to do. The next step is introducing captive pandas into the wild. That research slowed after a few freed bears were found dead. And, as you are about to see, no Chinese scientist can afford to lose even one baby cute cat bear.

Giant pandas have been chewing bamboo for about 3 million years, but they were so elusive in the high mountains of China, pandas weren't discovered by western naturalists until 1869.

Today their fans know where to find them. Each morning humans compete for position at the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding in Central China. A ticket is about eight bucks. Some days there are 100,000 visitors. So, yes, that's $800,000 a day. But the experience is priceless. If these bears were in the wild, they'd be rare and solitary. They would be in alpine forests as high as 13,000 feet and we saw, about 30 feet up, how they went unnoticed for so long.

At the research base, each bear is known by name, liked online and wrapped in the flag. A selfie with China's national symbol, is a tap of patriotism.

Marc Valitutto: When I'm out on the street, and if anybody asks me about what I do, I tell them, "I work with giant pandas," they immediately thank me. And then they follow it up with, "That is our national treasure."

Enriching the treasure is the work of Marc Valitutto, a wildlife veterinarian from the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, on loan to the Chengdu Research Base.

The Smithsonian has helped propagate pandas since China sent Richard Nixon home with a pair in 1972. Back then, China barely had two to spare. By the 1980's there were only about 1,200 left, in China's bamboo forests, which humans were cutting down.

Scott Pelley: Is bamboo the only thing they eat?

Marc Valitutto: 99% of their diet in the wild is bamboo.

A forest is delivered every day to the Chengdu base. The common name, "panda," means "bamboo eater." But because this member of the grass family is so low in nutrition, each bear spends up to 16 hours a day shredding 40 pounds of leaves and stems and that is hardly enough to keep him alive. So, the rest of the day, the bears burn as few calories as possible. Even mating is incredibly rare.

Marc Valitutto: Only once a year can a female be prepared for breeding. And that is within a very small three-day window.

Scott Pelley: A female panda is capable of breeding three days a year?

Marc Valitutto: Exactly. A very small time.

A very small time for a very small bear.

Scott Pelley: and, how old are these cubs?

Dr. Wu Kongju: One month.

Dr. Wu Kongju told us, when these cubs are newborn, they average about four ounces. The size of a stick of butter.

Scott Pelley: And how many cubs do you bring into the world in a year?

Dr. Wu Kongju: This year is five. Five babies.

Scott Pelley: Of the five cubs that are born here this year, how many do you expect to survive?

Dr. Wu Kongju: All.

Scott Pelley: All of them?

Dr. Wu Kongju: All will survive. Yeah.

About half the time, pandas have twins but the mother can't care for both.

Marc Valitutto: In the wild, the smaller, the weaker twin will be left off to die, because the mother doesn't have enough energy to produce the amount of milk that's required for two babies.

But in captivity, twins are fed in the nursery and, with a touch, mom is called to duty, to nurse the twins one at a time so both survive. The cub's eyes won't open for about six weeks so mother helps him to her breast. And like every nursing mom, a change of position helps.

Especially, when her back is killing her.

The cubs are dependent up to three years. She'll raise only five, or maybe eight, in her lifetime.

Scott Pelley: How big do they become?

Marc Valitutto: So, the females can be up to maybe around 200 pounds, and the males up to 300 pounds.

Scott Pelley: Why are they black and white?

Marc Valitutto: You know, that's a very interesting question. It's a mechanism to protect themselves, like many, many other animals out there that are black and white or various different colors.

Scott Pelley: It's camouflage?

Marc Valitutto: You know pandas love the snow. So, the white parts really helped them hide in the snow, where the black would be presumptive of shadows.

The panda is a curious bear. In the last century, many biologists didn't think it belonged in the bear family. Pandas don't hibernate. And though they're virtual vegetarians, they have the digestive tract of a carnivore. Panda nutrition was a mystery when Dr. Hou Rong came here nearly 30 years ago. She's director of research and told us that the base started as a shelter for injured pandas that had been rescued.

Dr. Hou Rong (Translation): There were very few pandas. All of them were seriously ill, close to impossible to breed, we were also broke. I was the only scientist.

Scott Pelley: You had a dozen pandas?

Dr. Hou Rong: Yes.

Scott Pelley: How many do you have now?

Dr. Hou Rong: Now is 200.

200 healthy pandas have grown from the research into nutrition and understanding those fleeting female hormones. It's gone so well that a new area of research has opened: panda geriatrics. The bears live about 20 years in the wild but up to 35 in the company of man. In 1937, a leading American naturalist described the giant panda as "an extremely stupid beast, dull and primitive." But Marc Valitutto showed us pandas understand commands.

The whistle signals something good is about to happen, generally involving apple slices. Then, on cue, the bear volunteered its arm, through the bars, to a metal tray and gripped a handle. It's having a blood test.Marc Valitutto: All of the pandas, the adult pandas here, are trained specifically to offer their arm for a blood sample. It really helps us to prevent the animals from having to be anesthetized and allows the animal to be an active participant in their health.

Scott Pelley: I've seen people throw a bigger fuss than he did.

Marc Valitutto: They're incredibly complex creatures, just like many other bear species or carnivorous species like dogs and cats.

Like dogs, pandas come at the sound of their name. They know their day will start with apples and continue at the endless bamboo buffet.

But success in captivity does not necessarily mean salad days for the species. To thrive, genetically, they must come home to the wild.

Melissa Songer: This is really an exciting time, because they're doing so well in captivity. And we can really consider them safe. That's not so for the wild populations.

Melissa Songer is a Smithsonian conservation biologist working at the foot of Mount Qingcheng, near the center of China.

Melissa Songer: This is the Chengdu Field Research Center and most people know it as Panda Valley. And it was established for the purpose of preparing captive pandas for release into the wild.

Scott Pelley: One of the amazing things that we saw is how well trained they are. But it strikes me that that's a blessing and a curse.

Melissa Songer: They don't have the opportunity to learn how to find food or defend against predators. Even mating is very complex in the wild. So yes, they're highly trained, but they aren't really trained to be in the wild.Scott Pelley: Then do you train them to be wild? And-- and if so, how do you do that?Melissa Songer: They're not going to be fed. They're going to have to move around and find food. And taking it step by step so acclimatizing them to a very different situation is an important phase before full release.Scott Pelley: Like sending the kids off to college.Melissa Songer: Yeah. Exactly.

There are fewer than 2,000 wild pandas, living in only three mountainous provinces of china. They're segregated into small groups, cut off from one another by roads, farms and villages.

Melissa Songer: About half of those populations are less than ten pandas. And so that kind of puts them at risk for losing genetic diversity, it puts them at risk for other events, natural disasters, diseases that might come through. So, it's a dangerous number.

To reduce the danger, two research bases are testing competing ideas. One, from a research station called Wolong, minimizes contact with people, to the point of dressing the trainers in panda suits that are scented with panda urine so the bears don't even get a whiff of humanity. The other approach encourages the human relationship, in case a panda needs to be rescued. While the bears walk on the wild side, they're monitored with radio collars in case they get into trouble.

So far, 14 pandas have been released, three have died. But those few failures have slowed the research because if a panda is killed, it's not just some 'bear,' it's a bear with a name, and a million "likes" on its webpage.

Melissa Songer: Any time you release a captive animal to the wild you're taking a risk. And you prepare as best you can, but there are things you can't really prepare for.

One of the pandas who died was attacked by dogs, another appears to have fallen from a tree. The captive-born pandas take longer to establish territory but, for the most part, they fit in. China says it will soon spend more than a billion dollars on a 10,000 square mile panda national reserve to connect those pockets of wild bears.

Scott Pelley: It suggests that species can be saved.

Marc Valitutto: It absolutely does. But more than that, what's even better than the survivability of this species is that they are an umbrella species, meaning that the care that we provide for the pandas and the tracts of land that we preserve, will also save a whole multitude of other species that also need our care, that a lot of people don't even know about.

Which raises a fair question. If a multitude of species is saved, if climate benefits from five million acres of forest reserve, are we saving the panda or is the panda saving us?

Produced by Nicole Young. Associate producers, Katie Kerbstat and Ian Flickinger

View post:
Giant pandas: Saving the giant panda from extinction - 60 Minutes - CBS News

Column: Popular diet trends are not the way to lose weight – The Huntington News

Posted: October 27, 2019 at 9:50 am

We all know one of those people who went on a crazy diet and lost what seems like half their body weight, and if youre anything like me, you have been jealous of them but dont have the willpower to follow in their footsteps. Or maybe you went a step further than I did and tried the same diet as your friend but didnt find the same success.

The reason why most diets dont work is simple: People just cant stick to them.

Some of the most popular diets are the Whole30, Keto, Paleo and CICO.

These kinds of diets are not sustainable. The Whole30, for example, is named after the fact that it only lasts 30 days. But after that month, the dieter is left saying, Now what?

The truth is, although there arent exact numbers to prove this, it is estimated that anywhere between 80 and 95 percent of people who are successful with their weight loss after their diet eventually gain it back.

There are an overwhelming number of diets out there for people to choose from, with new diets constantly surfacing. Cookbooks, documentaries and guides are becoming more and more popular, contributing to a $72 billion weight loss industry. This number is only expected to increase, as the total market is forecasted to grow 2.6% annually through 2023.

The Whole30 diet consists of not eating sugar for 30 days, cutting out cravings and starting to eliminate sugar addiction.

There is also the popular ketogenic (keto) diet, also known as low carbing, which is a diet where you consume little to no carbohydrates. When you lower your amount of carbohydrate intake, it forces the body into a state of ketosis the body starts to burn fat to generate energy instead of the typical burning of carbohydrates.

The Paleo diet is a diet that supposedly mimics a diet that may have been eaten in the Paleolithic Era. According to the Mayo Clinic, [a] paleo diet typically includes lean meats, fish, fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds foods that in the past could be obtained by hunting and gathering. This diet is often criticised, as there is evidence that humans of the Paleolithic Era ate grains, and the modern day paleo diet calls for no grains.

Another diet rising in popularity is CICO, an acronym for calories in, calories out. This is a diet where you track all the calories you eat and all of the calories you burn. The goal of CICO is to burn more calories than you consume. This diet requires heavy involvement, as you have to measure the exact amount of calories you are eating and the precise amount of calories you burn. The deficit in the amount of calories you consume should, theoretically, correspond to the amount of weight you lose.

Common and potentially problematic sources of information for people seeking health advice are documentaries and dieting guidebooks. The documentary What the Health, for example, claims that eating one egg is equivalent to smoking five cigarettes. This statement shocked me, as I am someone who eats about 18 eggs a week I love eggs.

The basis behind this claim is that egg yolks are particularly fat-filled, while protein actually comes from the egg white. People who smoke five cigarettes a day have higher cholesterol, and the high amount of fat in egg yolks will apparently lead to the same result.

However, just because you eat an egg a day doesnt automatically make your health equivalent to that of a heavy smoker. The study that led some nutritionists to this conclusion was done on a group of individuals who were already sick and at risk for high cholesterol.

Maria Luz Fernandez, a professor at the University of Connecticut in the Department of Nutritional Sciences, has used her expertise in the field to help skeptics question this bold assertion. Eggs should not be eliminated from the diet because they not only provide a substantial amount of nutrients, but they also have health benefits that go beyond nutrition, Fernandez said in an interview with Best Food Facts.

Other claims in this film should be taken with a grain of salt as well. Sure, some studies say red meat is bad for you, and it has been proven that eating a vegetarian or vegan diet has numerous environmental benefits. But not all of the assertions made in the documentary can be taken as fact, and these statements can be confusing to Americans trying to navigate their way through the multibillion-dollar weight loss industry.

Should dieters commit to a drastic lifestyle change by going vegan? Should they do something short-term and try the Whole30? Is there any diet that falls somewhere in between?

In the end, a truly sustainable diet is about finding an eating pattern that works for you.

The secret to actually losing weight is not found in a diet like Keto, Paleo, the Whole30, CICO or veganism. It does not matter what diet you decide to do, or if you decide to go on a diet at all. Instead, the key is balancing your activity level with the amount of calories you consume. Find a diet you can stick to so it does not feel like a diet anymore just the way you live.

See more here:
Column: Popular diet trends are not the way to lose weight - The Huntington News

Race and the Science of Starvation – The MIT Press Reader

Posted: October 27, 2019 at 9:50 am

Among the specious claims about the role of meat in the history of humanity: A meat-rich diet brings with it a masculine vigor that distinguishes carnivorous races.

Prior to the identification of the micronutrients we call vitamins in the 1930s, nutrition science was mainly a science of animal energetics, or the study of how animals metabolize food into energy. Animal energetics, in turn, was a science of animal starvation. It was also a science of race.

The questions physiologists asked about animal energetics were straightforward: How much energy was required to keep an animal from starving under various conditions (for example, physical regimen, ambient temperature)? How much protein specifically, in the early days, how much meat was required to maintain the animal in nitrogen equilibrium, that is, to ensure that the quantity of nitrogen lost as urea in the urine was equal to that ingested? Efforts to measure metabolic rate by gauging the volume of carbon dioxide expelled in respiration went back at least to the French chemist Antoine Lavoisiers experiments with guinea pigs in the 1780s, but for a long time, respirometry remained cumbersome and subject to the concern that what an animal did under a respirometer hood did not represent a good approximation to what it did out in the world. So in most labs, the key methods of research into the 1910s were collecting animal waste and fasting animals, often to the death.

A variety of animals were sacrificed by starvation: rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, chickens, cats, and dogs. Physiologists were partial to dogs, and canine hunger artists were cited with approval in the energetics literature into the 1950s. A dog in one lab in Tokyo was reported in 1898 to have survived 98 days without food before succumbing, having lost 65 percent of its body mass. Fourteen years later, physiologists at the University of Illinois reported they had fasted their dog Oscar 117 days before ending the experiment: Oscar refused to manifest the increase in excreted nitrogen typical of late-stage morbidity and in fact remained in such good spirits, as his handlers reported, that he had to be restrained as the fast went on from leaping out of and into his cage before and after his daily weighing lest he injure himself.

Humans, of course, could not be involuntarily fasted to the death, but self-experimentation was rampant in the energetics world. After 1890, fasting gained popularity as a health cure and the key to vigor, productivity, Christian virtue, masculinity, and racial superiority. Interest in fasting cures continued into the 1920s even as fasting gave way, in energetics research, to respirometric studies of resting metabolic rate and controlled trials of calorie restriction.

While humans couldnt be involuntarily fasted to death in the name of research, a variety of animals were: rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, chickens, cats, and dogs.

The practical aims of animal energetics were twofold. One was to improve feed conversion in livestock and, more broadly, to formulate generalizations about the relationship between body size and basal metabolic rate. The other was to understand the energy and protein needs of humans under different occupations. To most of the people involved in the debate around these questions, the underlying policy concern was clear: How much meat did you need to maintain an industrial labor force? not to say a modern army and navy.

Around 1900, conventional wisdom held that active men required between 100 and 120 grams of protein a day at a minimum a grossly high estimate predominantly from animal sources, and an energy intake in the vicinity of 3,000 kcal. Periodically, reports would emerge of people getting by on considerably less a community of fructarians in California, say but these reports were mostly ignored.

The dominant voice in this conversation was that of German physiologist Carl von Voit. Voits laboratory at Munich had pioneered a number of the techniques then becoming standard in the physiology labs of the United States and Japan, notably the use of nitrogen equilibrium as a proxy for protein needs. Voit clove to a figure of 118 grams (4 ounces) of protein per day for a man of 70 kilograms (154 pounds) doing light work. This struck Yale physiologist Russell Chittenden as nonsense. In 1902 Chittenden undertook a series of clinical studies to demonstrate that 50 to 55 grams (2 ounces) of protein a day, and a considerably reduced energy intake, would keep young men in vigor and nitrogen balance indefinitely.

Chittenden put groups of Yale athletes and newly inducted U.S. Army soldiers (N of eight and 13, respectively) on carefully controlled diets and exercise regimens and observed them over a period of months their food intake, their excreta, and their performance on various measures of fitness. He also kept notes on his own food intake and physical activity. The diets in question were experimental only in the sense that portions and protein content were controlled. In other respects, the food was ordinary and not especially healthy (lunch for the soldiers for one week included hamburgers, macaroni and cheese, clam chowder, bean porridge, and beef stew).

Opinion was divided as to the significance of his findings. One contemporary praised Chittendens rigor but thought it was too soon to attribute participants physical achievements to diet, since there was no control for the independent effects of the regimented way of life implicated in the experiments. Fifty years later, the nutritional biochemist Henry Sherman would hail Chittendens work as a breakthrough in understanding just how elastic the human response to protein is. Others regarded Chittendens results as a curiosity. But there were those who saw Chittendens work as anathema.

Chief among these was Major D. McCay, a professor of physiology in Calcutta. McCay, on the basis of long observation in India and a series of experiments with the diets of prisoners in Bengal, argued that Chittendens conclusions were not just wrong but dangerously so, for they undermined the clear connection between a diet rich in animal protein and the masculine vigor of the more advanced races. There is little doubt, he writes, that the evidence of mankind points indisputably to a desire for protein up to European standards.

As soon as a race can provide itself with such amounts, he adds, it promptly does so; as soon as financial considerations are surmounted, so soon the so-called vegetarian Japanese or Hindu raises his protein intake to reach the ordinary standard of mankind in general.

Do we know, for example, how far the change from the omnivorous diet to the vegetarian can be carried with impunity? asked Cornell biochemist William Adolph. Many of our blessings in health and vigor are, nutritionally speaking, related to animal protein.

That is, McCay argues, it is meats income elasticity that determines its rate of consumption. As soon as a race achieves the income necessary to support a meat-rich diet presumably by adopting the industrial labor discipline of Europeans its meat consumption shoots up and, with it, the masculine vigor that distinguishes meat-eating races everywhere. Writing a hundred years later, the geographer Vaclav Smil puts it another way: As soon as incomes rise, the cultural constructs of pre-industrial societies fall away.

With time, the tone of arguments like McCays changes. Talk of race becomes more muted, but concern about the implications of a vegetarian diet for national development persists. For Cornell biochemist William Adolph, writing toward the end of World War II, the protein problem of China was that for the 85 to 90 percent of the population living in the countryside, the diet was basically vegetarian. More precisely, 95 percent of the protein in the rural diet came from plant sources. Plant-source proteins, Adolph frets, are inferior both in that they are less easily digested and in that the protein they provide is lower in biological value; today we would say its Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score is lower. He expresses surprise at the success of the Chinese peasants he has observed in devising combinations of plant proteins that exceed those of any of the constituents another case of blind experimentation, examples of which are wide-spread throughout Asia. But his experiences in China do not leave him sanguine about the possibilities of diet modification in the United States in service of the war effort: Do we know, for example, how far the change from the omnivorous diet to the vegetarian can be carried with impunity? Many of our blessings in health and vigor are, nutritionally speaking, related to animal protein.

Today we are faced with the opposite question: How far can the change to a carnivorous diet be carried with impunity? In the nutritional niche characteristic of emerging urban markets, growing meat consumption masks, and perhaps makes possible, growing precariousness.

Josh Berson is an independent social scientist. He has held research appointments at the Berggruen Institute and the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, among other places. He is the author of The Meat Question, from which this article is adapted.

Excerpt from:
Race and the Science of Starvation - The MIT Press Reader

Detroit Entrepreneurs Fight Food Insecurity With Lessons Of The Past – NPR

Posted: October 27, 2019 at 9:50 am

Fresh Corner Caf sells loose fruits and fresh pre-packaged items like salads, sandwich wraps and fruit cups to corner stores, grocery stores and gas stations. Courtesy of Valaurian Waller hide caption

Fresh Corner Caf sells loose fruits and fresh pre-packaged items like salads, sandwich wraps and fruit cups to corner stores, grocery stores and gas stations.

On a cold, sunny day in early February, Raphael Wright and his business partner, Sonya Greene, check out a vacant building in Detroit's Linwood neighborhood. Inside, wood panels are on the floor, and drywall is being placed over exposed brick. The only clue to the building's past is a sign out front, with the words "Liquor, Beepers, and Check Cashing."

Located on the west side of Detroit, the Linwood neighborhood remains underdeveloped, with few retail businesses, countless empty lots and many vacant buildings. But Wright and Greene see potential here. It's why they've chosen this neighborhood to open a bodega that sells healthy food. Like other neglected neighborhoods in urban areas, fresh fruits and vegetables aren't a basic necessity here they're a luxury.

Wright says it's been that way since he was a kid.

"I was raised in the '90s, and I always say that we were junk food babies," he explains. "So we only ate our full courses out of liquor stores, gas stations, and many times fast food restaurants were pretty much our go-to places to eat."

Wright learned at a young age the cost of a diet based on convenient, processed foods.

"I'm a victim of food insecurity," he says. "I'm 30 years old. I was diagnosed with diabetes at 19, so before I was old enough to have a drink, I was diabetic."

Wright wants the bodega, tentatively named the Glendale Mini Mart, to be a pilot for a full-range grocery store he hopes to open in the future. The bodega will offer fresh produce, prepared foods and staple items. He says he hopes it will be part of a larger mixed-use development that will include a barber shop, a beauty salon and housing.

"This is my opportunity to not only service a community, but to show proof of this new, fresh concept of how to introduce healthier food access in our communities," Wright says.

Wright and Greene are not the first to recognize the importance of Detroit's African American residents having access to fresh, reasonably priced food. That awareness began more than 50 years ago, following the rebellion that rocked the city.

In late July 1967, one of the deadliest and most destructive riots in this country's history took place in the Virginia Park neighborhood of Detroit. What started as a confrontation between black residents and the Detroit Police Department lasted five days and resulted in the deaths of 43 people. More than 2,000 buildings were looted, burned or destroyed.

The riots were the culmination of high levels of frustration, resentment and anger among African Americans due to unemployment, poverty, racial segregation, police brutality and lack of economic and education opportunities. However, there was something else not often discussed food.

Sonya Greene and Raphael Wright want to open a bodega that will offer fresh produce, prepared foods and staple items in an underdeveloped neighborhood. Brittany Hutson/WDET hide caption

Sonya Greene and Raphael Wright want to open a bodega that will offer fresh produce, prepared foods and staple items in an underdeveloped neighborhood.

According to Alex Hill, adjunct professor at Wayne State University in Detroit, there was a "fairly expansive hunger issue in the community" around that time. Hill's research on the '67 Rebellion looks at food, power and race. In many ways, it's the continuation of work that began when the non-profit group Focus: Hope began studying conditions in Detroit's black neighborhoods in the '60s as a response to the riots.

Focus: HOPE educated the clergy and the white Christian community on racism, poverty and other forms of injustice. In 1968, the organization released a Consumer Survey on Food and Drugs. The survey sought to answer three questions: Do the poor pay more for food? Does skin color affect in-store service? Are food facilities and products equal for inner city and suburban shoppers?

To get answers, nearly 400 suburban white women and inner-city black women were trained as undercover shoppers and sent to 300 grocery stores in the Detroit metro area. The main findings were that poor inner-city Detroiters were paying up to 20% more for lower-quality groceries. The survey also found that the quality of service, store condition, produce and meats in the city's chain and independent stores were not of average quality compared to upper- income and suburban stores.

The conclusion of the survey provided a few recommendations, some of which included a massive consumer education program targeting the poor and poor African Americans; negotiations with major chains to build new stores in certain impoverished areas; renovations of existing stores and equipment; and hiring African American personnel, particularly managers.

It is unknown if there was any response to the survey.

Hill says today, the choices available to black and white shoppers are still unequal. "In thinking about those disparities and access, those are still very much real. They may look different, but I'd say they're very much the same from 1967," he says.

Hill explains that Detroiters travel outside of the city on weekends to larger chain grocers to stock up and use their local grocer for smaller needs, such as eggs or milk, during the week.

"We often don't think about the cost of time for Detroit residents to reach these locations," he says. "Transportation is a kind of regular conversation that's had in the city that makes it very difficult to access food of different types."

In Detroit, most grocery stores in the city are independently owned. According to the 2018 Detroit Food Metric Report, there are 71 full-scale grocery stores in the city, but only two types of chain stores Whole Foods and Meijer. In a city that is 142 square miles and still predominantly African American, none of the grocery stores is black-owned.

The Fight Against Food Insecurity

Valaurian Waller is the co-owner of Fresh Corner Caf, which sells pre-packaged items such as salads, sandwich wraps and fruit cups to corner stores, grocery stores and gas stations.

"People like to call Detroit a food desert and it's not," she says. "It's somewhat of a misnomer. There's food in Detroit, it's just kind of hard to get to."

One of Waller's partners is Peaches and Greens, a produce market in Detroit's New Center neighborhood. The store sells pantry items, dry goods, snacks, and other locally made food products. Fresh Corner works directly with stores like Peaches and Greens. It also works with schools, the YMCA and senior housing developments.

"Fresh Corner had this idea to kind of cut out the middleman and bring fresh food options to places people already go and have easy access to anyways," Waller says. "If you're going down to your corner store to shop for a few food things, it makes sense to come to you."

Waller grew up on the east side of Detroit, but went to middle school and high school in Grosse Pointe, an affluent suburb northeast of Detroit with a history of discriminatory real estate practices. While in school, Waller noticed the jarring differences in food access between the two areas.

"The difference between a Kroger in Detroit and the Kroger in Grosse Pointe is laughable," she says. "Just seeing the juxtaposition of those two worlds and those experiences really inspired me to be like, there has to be a solution to this. There has to be awareness of the inequality in these issues."

Back at the site of the future Glendale Mini Mart, Greene walks along the front of the building. She is a registered nurse who grew up in Linwood. The property has been in her family for at least 40 years, and she bought the building from her family to start the store. Greene says there's always been a need in Linwood for healthy food.

"It has to start with the education component," she says. "That's pretty much what this is about. It's teaching with love and understanding and saying, 'Yeah, we know that you've not had an option but we're here to give you something else to choose from.'"

Wright says the bodega is also about representation.

"We've seen our grocery stores not be representative of our communities," he says. "So putting faces in the community that looked like us, that are from our neighborhoods and understand what we're going through, it makes the education part easier."

This story comes to us from member station WDET in Detroit. You can hear the audio here. Brittany Hutson is a writer and freelance journalist and was a WDET Feet In 2 Worlds Fellow. Follow her on Twitter: @fedandbougie

See the original post:
Detroit Entrepreneurs Fight Food Insecurity With Lessons Of The Past - NPR

The life and rise of Tim Sweeney, the billionaire CEO and founder of the company behind ‘Fortnite,’ Epic Games – Business Insider

Posted: October 27, 2019 at 9:50 am

Tim Sweeney may seem like your average guy. He likes hiking, tinkering with technology, the occasional Diet Coke, and fried chicken from Bojangles'.

However, he is anything but average. Sweeney is the CEO of Epic Games, the company behind "Fortnite" the popular battle-royale-style video game that raked in over $2.5 billion in 2018. Epic Games also brought games like "Gears of War" into the mainstream.

Sweeney has a net worth of $7 billion,millions of which he has donated to forest conservation efforts.

When it comes to tech execs, Sweeney is one who remains rather low-key. He's single, unmarried, and doesn't have any kids. And he's never been enticed by the flashy trappings of Silicon Valley: Epic Games is based out of Cary, North Carolina, just down the road from Raleigh.

Sweeney's first-ever job is still his current job, though the responsibilities have changed since founding Epic Games in 1991. Overall, Sweeney describes his life as "simple." If he means a simple life that has also radically changed the way millions of people play video games online, then, sure a simple life indeed.

Here's everything you need to know about Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games.

Link:
The life and rise of Tim Sweeney, the billionaire CEO and founder of the company behind 'Fortnite,' Epic Games - Business Insider

As his Alzheimers looms, Charles and Pam Ogletree take one last walk in love – The Boston Globe

Posted: October 27, 2019 at 9:50 am

His name is Charles J. Ogletree Jr., and he was, not long ago, a dazzling, dominating legal mind, a theorist and scholar internationally revered for his brilliance and compassion. He inspired generations of students as a Harvard Law School professor, including the young Barack and Michelle Obama. He was a crusader for civil rights, the founder of the Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice, and a prolific author who investigated police conduct in black communities and the role of race in capital punishment, long before the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement.

For decades, his schedule was booked solid; there were weeks when his wife, Pam, barely saw him. He gave speeches around the world, and offered guidance at historic moments, as when apartheid ended in South Africa and he helped to draft that countrys brand-new constitution. He mentored young lawyers, analyzed high-profile cases on national TV, and still somehow found time for pro bono casework, aiding unknown defendants in gritty Boston courts.

He was only 60 when his wife began to notice subtle changes in his speech. He was 62 when he was diagnosed with Alzheimers disease. Three years ago, at 63, Ogletree went public with his battle. He named his nemesis and vowed to fight it, the way hed fought injustices so many times before. He is fighting still, holding onto what is left. But so much of who he was has been taken from him: Reading and writing. Traveling the world. Debate and discussion and his first great passion, fishing.

The losses happen without ceremony. One day things are possible, another they are gone.

They had told themselves they would not dwell on that. I want to focus on what I have, Charles told Pam when he was diagnosed, not on what Im losing, or on what I had. They pledged to stay in the moment, savor it. To spend their time living.

And so as his world closes in, she pushes back. She plays the music he loved, tells him the old stories. In almost any kind of weather, they go walking. Charles always liked to walk, she says, but now he walks as if his life depends on it.

They have walked together by the sea at Worlds End in Hingham, and on flat sand beaches in Nahant and Duxbury. They walked at Great Meadows in Concord, and beside the granite ledges on Rockports Halibut Point. Charless pace has slowed in recent years; he might drag a leg, or stumble. Still, he presses on, walking 2 miles, 3 miles, 4.

Pam lets him set the pace, and she stays beside him. She marvels at his will and determination. For all he has surrendered, his walk still concedes nothing. He walks like a man trying to get somewhere.

. . .

FROM THE FIRST DAYS of their acquaintance, she could see how it would be: Charles the bright light at the center of the room, drawing people in and bringing them together. As soon as they arrived at Stanford University for their freshman year, he began to stand out as a leader. Pam admired his ease with people, the way he seemed to throw his arms around every one of the 70 black students in their class of 1,500, making each feel special. She was so different from him, so introverted and reserved, it thrilled her to be pulled into his lively circle, where they were good friends before becoming something more.

It was 1971 when they met as freshmen. Pamela Barnes had been a top student at Compton High School, in Southern California. Charles had grown up desperately poor in the segregated town of Merced, Calif., where his father, a farmhand, had a fifth-grade education. When a high school guidance counselor recognized Charless potential, and encouraged him to apply to Stanford, the young man resisted. He had never heard of the campus two hours from his home and thought the counselor meant the town of Stamford, in Connecticut.

Once enrolled, he quickly came into his own. He cut a bold figure, with his flat hat and colorful clothes, Pam recalled, and he was soon involved in everything, editing a student newspaper, joining the student government, and organizing activists to protest the trial of Angela Davis. It was there, closely watching the famous case unfold, that he first became transfixed by legal strategies and arguments. Later, as he considered where to continue his studies, it was Pam who urged him to apply to Harvard Law School.

Their life together followed the path of his career, first in Cambridge, where he graduated from Harvard Law in 1978, then in Washington, D.C., where he won cases and a stellar reputation as a public defender in the 1980s, and finally back in Cambridge again when he was hired to teach at Harvard. They had two children, a son and a daughter. Pam earned an MBA and had her own career, running academic enrichment programs, launching a charter school, and later, serving as president and CEO at the nonprofit agency Childrens Services of Roxbury.

Her work for disadvantaged families went on quietly. Charles, meanwhile, became a kind of intellectual celebrity in the 1990s, a sought-after TV legal analyst who once predicted O.J. Simpsons acquittal. He investigated Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas for the NAACP, and represented Anita Hill during Thomass ground-shifting 1991 Senate confirmation hearings. When friends and colleagues asked for help, he always said yes, his wife said, in keeping with his belief that he had been blessed, and should strive to give back.

He still squeezed in Boy Scout camping trips with his son, and fishing trips with old friends on Marthas Vineyard. At the pinnacle of his career, his wife said, there was so much going on, so many people around him. ... It was hard, sometimes, to even know him.

Pam always imagined things would slow down one day. The requests would come less frequently, his schedule would ease, and they would have more quiet time together.

She never imagined that when they did, the man she loved would already be slipping away.

. . .

THE DAY THEY first were told that Charles had Alzheimers disease, in May 2015, the couple was so flattened by the blow, it was hours before they could speak about it. The meeting at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston felt like surgery without the benefit of anesthesia, Pam later wrote in her journal. There were no buffers ... no words of hopefulness, just blunt, sharp words like widespread cognitive decline. The clinician offered no treatment possibilities, Pam recalled.

For a year or two, Pam and other family members had observed small changes in Charles, memory gaps and shifts in the complexity of his language, most pronounced when he was tired or stressed. Like most people, they thought Alzheimers struck older people, in their 70s and 80s. Charles seemed still in his prime, so devoted to his work he had never thought of stopping. On sabbatical that spring, he was preparing to write another book, Pam says, this time about the Obama presidency.

She had pushed him to undergo the extensive cognitive testing that led to his diagnosis out of concern that something might be wrong. But she had never thought it could be Alzheimers, a disease with no cure, and few prospects even for new drugs to ease its symptoms. Both Ogletrees struggled to accept the outcome and sought a second opinion at Mount Auburn Hospital in Cambridge in late 2015. Those tests confirmed the first finding, devastating them again.

The future loomed suddenly before them as a threat. Pam left her job soon after his diagnosis, determined to make the most of their time together. Charles kept working, and struggled with denial, Pam said. Concerned that he was overburdening himself, she encouraged him to be more open about his condition, and by the summer of 2016, he was ready to speak publicly. Announcing his Alzheimers diagnosis for the first time at a national church conference, he said his deeply rooted, lifelong faith in God allowed him to feel grateful instead of angry.

I want to be a spokesperson, he told the Globe at the time. I want to tell people, dont be afraid of it.

This was something else he could do for others, challenging the shame and stigma of brain illness. But it was a relief for him, too, to let the truth come out, says Pam. He didnt have to fight so hard anymore to hide what was happening to his famous mind.

. . .

PAM HAD MOVED THEM toward acceptance, but that did not mean they would surrender to the illness. She had prayed long and hard to find direction, and found something that felt like an answer. An online ad led her to a West Coast Alzheimers expert, Dr. Dale Bredesen, who championed a holistic treatment regimen for his patients. He believed the roots of Alzheimers lay in a complex web of interconnected factors, not simply from protein fragments, or plaque that built up in the brain. Bredesen claimed some patients could gain back lost ground by overhauling their diet and exercise habits, and by addressing their past exposure to toxins.

The key to success under Bredesens plan is early treatment, even before symptoms become evident. Charles Ogletree was well beyond that point. But the couple craved some means of fighting back, and some way to fuel their days with optimism. By early 2017, they had gone all in with Bredesen, signing up for blood screenings and a costly four-day retreat where they were schooled in the use of physical activity and a ketogenic diet, which largely cuts out carbohydrates and replaces them with fat, to trigger the bodys natural defenses.

At the retreat, alongside other families, the Ogletrees were flooded with relief. Charles would go up to the front of the class every day and take copious notes, Pam said. He was so motivated, and so hopeful to be on a path. Back at home, he started work with a personal trainer while she took charge in the kitchen, stripping their diet of sugar and processed foods. Determined to try every way they could to fight his symptoms, they tested their homes air quality, and removed mold from their basement.

In her journal from those months, Pam recorded the progress she saw: a resurgence of Charless personality, his optimism and outgoing nature that had waned. He engaged with people more, she says, joked with them, and began to talk about a wider range of subjects.

That upturn, she says, was worth every step theyd taken. Yet they understood that his disease would not be vanquished. Cruelly, it reared up after a lull, as if to remind them of its silent progress. In June 2017, on a nine-day trip to Italy with Pam, Charles was gloriously happy, she recalled, drinking in every word of history and culture. In Venice on the last day of the tour, Pam paused to photograph a picturesque canal. When she turned back to their group, Charles was gone.

For 14 hours, Pam searched the storied city, combing through the twists and turns of its maze-like alleys. She called police, her children, the embassy; she felt numb with terror as night fell. Finally, near the bus station, their guide found him sitting on a bench, shopping bags nearby, calm but with a vaguely worried air.

Flying home to Boston the next day, Pam grieved silently for another loss: She knew, after what had happened, this would be their last trip overseas together.

. . .

WHAT SHE NOW WANTS most is to keep him close: to care for him at home for as long as she can manage.

For the moment, it seems within her grasp. Most of the time, he is easygoing, though there are restless mornings when he paces through the house, flipping switches on and off, trying to escape an unease he cannot name.

Pam knows how quickly things can change. There was a time, late last year, when she thought she might have to let him go, to live in a place with more support, after his symptoms took a brief aggressive turn. Cooking dinner in their kitchen one evening last December, on a day when she could tell he was unsettled, she was startled when he pushed her, knocking over a jar, and then swung a hand at her when she asked him to stop. Alarmed, she called 911.

The responding officers spoke quietly to Charles, calmly asking him to come with them to the hospital. He resisted and was physically combative. In the hallway, overcome by fear and guilt, Pam could not bear to watch as the officers restrained her husband. At Cambridge Hospital, where he was confused but calm, they spent four days in the emergency room, waiting for a bed to open up at McLean Hospital in Belmont. Doctors there adjusted his medication, and the aggression disappeared, allowing him to go home again.

It felt to Pam like a reprieve, and she tried, in its wake, to anchor herself even more firmly in the present.

They still pray together many mornings, Pam kneeling on a sofa cushion on the floor in the living room while Charles sits and listens on the couch beside her. He no longer pipes up with addenda to her prayers, but he seems attentive, even calmed by what she says.

In the beginning, she prayed for him to get better. Now she prays more often for acceptance.

For a long while, he resisted his growing dependence on her, for simple tasks like washing and dressing that had so long been his own. In time he gave in to that change, too that they would do these things together now, as they had done so much else, for almost 50 years.

Pam welcomed his acquiescence, but it scared her, too. If he comes to a point where hes completely peaceful ...

She paused in their quiet living room in Cambridge, morning sunlight falling on her face.

Im trying to hold onto him for as long as I can.

It is impossible to be sure how much he remembers, or what is left of his sense of self. Sometimes she reminds him, playfully. I know you! she exclaims, her voice warm and bright. Youre Charles James Ogletree, from Merced, California! He might look her way, or nod in response. But she thinks his name, and hers, are often lost to him.

Something else remains, though, that matters more to her: He knows who she is to him, and has always been. The one who loves him and takes care of him. The one who is always there beside him, when he falls asleep at night and wakes up in the morning.

. . .

THE TRAITS THAT define her husband are still there, the compassion and empathy and sociability. Pam knows this because she sees it for herself, brilliant flashes of Charless old self emerging.

One afternoon last spring, when Pam picked him up at his day program, he noticed a young man in the parking lot beside them, helping his father into the car.

Charles rolled down his window and spoke to the young stranger. Youre doing a great job, he told him kindly.

Pam was startled, but the gesture was familiar. That was always Charles, she said. Always encouraging people.

Friends came rarely, but a few had stayed with them. They called sometimes and spoke to Charles as he mostly listened. His dearest friend had visited last March, unsure if Charles would know him. But Charles lit up and hugged him, both in tears. You and I go way back, Charles said. We fished together.

Pam lives for those extraordinary, unexpected moments. When he allows her to hug him, or smiles, it feels like a gift. One night this fall, he turned to her abruptly. Are you all right? he asked with concern. I just want to make sure youre all right.

Youre a tough woman, he told her another day, in a tone that was clearly complimentary.

She copies his infrequent words down in her journal, sustenance to nourish her in the silences. Sometimes, the notes have an ominous quality, as when he noticed a cemetery one day. Dead people are over there, he said. Then he hugged his wife. Youll be all right, he told her.

They tried, last winter, to fly south to visit their daughter in Maryland, but the prospect of the airport security check proved too much for Charles, upsetting him so badly they had to abandon the trip. After that and after he went missing again, more than once, out for a walk on his own before she could stop him she knew it was time to consider leaving Cambridge. The pretty yellow house where they had lived for 30 years was a comfort, with his favorite chair, familiar neighbors, and his favorite breakfast place around the corner. But it was also a constant reminder of the past the setting for a life they had long since left behind.

Pam closed on a new house in August, in Maryland near their daughter and young granddaughter, and began the overwhelming task of packing up. It felt, some days, almost impossible. When she tried to sort through Charless library, containing hundreds of books, to choose those that could be discarded, she found volume after volume 150 in all lovingly inscribed by their authors to her husband.

By mid-October, she had thinned their possessions. Boxes stood stacked against the walls, ready for their November departure. She knew Charles sensed the upheaval ahead, and she knew it would be hard on him. She prayed the things she sought in their new home would help him, too: the closeness of loved ones, the awakening of a fresh start, and beautiful new places for them to go and walk.

. . .

THEIR TIME FOR WALKS near home is dwindling. So on a cloudy, windy Wednesday afternoon this month, they headed out from their house in Cambridge to nearby Danehy Park, one of their favorite walking spots.

Charles wore blue jeans, a gray fleece pullover, and a Dallas Cowboys baseball cap. He looked fit and trim and his pace was steady. Inside the park, pathways branched in several directions. Sweetheart, Pam asked him, do you want to go this way? But he had chosen his path already, bearing right and up a gentle slope without a word.

Here, on their walks, he could still take the lead. In most other places, it was difficult. He still wanted to buy things for himself, at the food stands where they sometimes stopped on weekend drives or the Shaws supermarket near their house. But clerks grew impatient when he became confused. Pam could step in to smooth things over, but that pained her, too; it felt like taking more of his personhood from him.

She wished the world understood his illness better. Everyone knew cancer patients might lose their hair, or become nauseous or exhausted. No one seemed to understand Charles when his disease flared into view, when he grew agitated at the airport, or forgot how to pay for his own protein bar.

There was so much darkness in his world, she craved the moments when she saw him happy. Several times during the summer in flagrant violation of their ketogenic diet she brought him a scoop of vegan strawberry ice cream from a shop in nearby Porter Square. He savored every spoonful, scraped the bowl clean, and clutched the empty paper cup in his hand all night.

Months later, the memory of his rapture was still enough to move his wife to tears.

She walked beside him now through the park in Cambridge, past toddlers twirling on the playground and teenagers giggling on a bench. He tucked his hands into his pockets, his face expressionless. She talked to him about their children and grandchildren, and pointed out a tree resplendent in its autumn yellows.

What they have now is different, and some would say poorer, but to Pam it is in some ways purer. Everything superfluous has gone away all posturing and ego; the petty resentments common to all marriages, leaving a connection deeper and truer than language.

It feels like I love him more now, she said one day this fall.

In the park, the wind was rising, the silvery sun no longer burning through the clouds. Sirens passed, above the chirp of crickets, as Pam asked Charles if it was time to go and find the car. No, came his unspoken answer, as he kept on walking; he was not ready yet to stop.

They turned back into the park together. She put her arm in his as they headed uphill.

Jenna Russell can be reached at jenna.russell@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @jrussglobe.

Go here to see the original:
As his Alzheimers looms, Charles and Pam Ogletree take one last walk in love - The Boston Globe

How to lose weight, according to this guy, who lost 15 kgs in 75 days without starving himself – GQ India – What a man’s got to do

Posted: October 27, 2019 at 9:49 am

A lose-weight-fast diet or a weight loss boot camp can only help you realise your unhealthy ways but not change or improve them. It may, however, motivate you to look for healthy, long term alternatives that dont just limit your body to fat loss but also improve your overall stamina, immunity and resilience without starving yourself. 30-year-old Navneet Sharma tells us that one of these healthier alternatives is counting calories, and he stumbled on this alternative on YouTube.

I never thought of myself as an overweight individual (though my wife kept pointing it out to me) till I saw a picture of myself, he says. And you know what, she was right. At 75 kgs, I looked a lot heavier than I was. At first, I was a little surprised but as soon as that feeling passed, I took it as a personal challenge to lose weight and get fit in the healthiest manner, he adds.

But with no previous knowledge of fitness or weight loss, Sharma turned to YouTube for inspiration. I was watching this random YouTube video on an easy way to calculate the calories in your food and how eating salads can help you to lose weight and found it interesting. Though, I have to admit that initially, I was not sure if any of one of these two methods would help my case, but I was still determined to try them.

QUICK READ: How many calories should you eat every day to lose weight?

I started counting calories by preparing a simple excel sheet for tracking my calorie intake, you can find out how to calculate yours here, and in a weeks time, I saw great results and went on to try a couple of different diet programs before making the below weight loss diet and workout plan to lose 15 kgs in 75 days."

"I arrived at the below diet plan after trying multiple combinations of popular weight loss diet programs found on YouTube. Notably, I had been going to the gym regularly for 4 years before going on this diet plan and realised that the main reason I was not in a great shape was because I was not eating healthy!"

"Consequently, I shunned sugar, sweets, oily/fried and restaurant food from my diet and saw an instant change. But shunning these meant I had to balance my diet with healthy alternatives as starving yourself will not do you any good. Thus I made this quantified 5-meal plan (within my calorie range) to not harm my metabolism or starve.

Pre-workout: Black coffee or Green tea

Post-workout: 5-6 boiled Egg whites

Breakfast: 2 Dosas (without any oil) with groundnut chutney OR 2 Idlis with groundnut chutney

Mid-day snack: Salad (1 cucumber + 1 carrot + 1 bell pepper + papaya)

Lunch: 2 Rotis (without oil)/ 130-140 gms cooked rice + any dal/vegetable curry (1 cup)

Evening snacks: 170 gms of chicken/ 1 fillet of fish + 2 figs

My dinner: 2 Rotis (without any oil) or 130-140 gms rice + any dal/ vegetable curry (1 cup)

Once I started eating right, regular workouts also started showing better results. Consequently, I started working out 6 days/week with a special emphasis on abs, as they are a big muscle group. This is the weight loss workout routine that I followed:

Day 1: Shoulder + Abs

Day 2: Biceps

Day 3: Back + Abs

Day 4: Triceps

Day 5: Chest + Abs

Day 6: Legs + Abs

"I have been able to maintain my weight at 59.5 kgs by following the excel chart routine that I made for myself to lose weight."

I have learnt that going to the gym and just working out will not help you lose weight if you dont eat clean. Concentrate on the things you consume and try to calculate their calories. Do not just engage in cardio but also focus on weight training, which will help you boost your metabolism and build muscles.

Disclaimer: The diet and workout routines shared by the respondents may or may not be approved by diet and fitness experts. GQ India doesn't encourage or endorse the weight loss tips & tricks shared by the person in the article. Please consult an authorised medical professional before following any specific diet or workout routine mentioned above.

NOW READ

How to lose weight like this guy who lost 21 kgs and became a certified nutritionist & fitness coach

Are treadmill workouts really as effective as running outside?

Bulk your arms with Chris Hemsworths devastating dumbbell workout

More on Fitness

Link:
How to lose weight, according to this guy, who lost 15 kgs in 75 days without starving himself - GQ India - What a man's got to do

Is intermittent fasting really worth It? – GQ India – What a man’s got to do

Posted: October 27, 2019 at 9:49 am

Chris Pratt! Hugh Jackman! Halle Berry! Kourtney Kardashian! What these celebrities have in common, other than a gratuitous exclamation point after their names, is a professed fondness for intermittent fasting, the diet craze turning the fitness world on its sweaty, well-toned head. For help determining whether you, too, should incorporate this into your 2019 resolution-related plans, we asked a few experts to explain what it is, why people love it, and whether its really worth the pain of forgoing on-demand snacks for the rest of the winter.

Intermittent fasting, unlike many other diets, is famously flexible in that you choose the days and hours during which you think its best to fast. The two most common methods are the 16:8 strategywhere you eat whatever you want (within reason) for eight hours a day and then fast for the other 16and the 5:2 method, where you eat normally five days a week and then keep your food intake to roughly 500-600 calories for the other two days. Its kind of a simplified-calories math problem thats supposed to prevent the yo-yo effect of weight loss and weight gain.

There are different ways to do this diet, but the bottom line is that no matter which you choose, youre taking in less energy, and because of that, youre going to start using your own body stores for energy, says Lisa Sasson, a clinical professor of nutrition at NYU. If you dont, youre not going to lose weight.

A recent study completed by the German Cancer Research Center concluded that intermittent fasting indeed helps lose weight and promotes health, and noted that the regimen proved especially adept at getting rid of fat in the liver. A USC study also found that the diet reduced participants risk of cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and other age-related diseases. While researchers involved cautioned that more testing is necessary, the results are at least encouraging.

Most people who swear by intermittent fasting will tell you it helps not only with losing weight but also with reducing belly fat. This is not a conclusion with scientific backing, but it is the sort of thing to which every six-pack enthusiast aspires.

Theres really no conclusive evidence that theres any benefit, Sasson says. The German Cancer Research Center study qualified its findings by noting that the positive results werent noticeably better than those experienced by subjects who adopted a conventional calorie-reduction diet. In other words, it works, but not notably better than the alternative. (Sasson also offered a helpful list of individuals who should not give intermittent fasting a try: pregnant women and anyone with diabetes, cancer, or an eating disorder.)

The best long-term diets, no matter what their rules entail, are the ones that are least difficult to maintainand again, in this regard, intermittent fasting isnt inherently superior to anything else. Are you making changes in your behavior? Have you learned positive habits so that when you go back to not fasting, youre going to be a healthier eater? Sasson asks. I know people who fast because they think, Okay, Im going to be really bad and overdrink or overeat, and then two days a week Im going to have a clean life, and thats just not how it works.

Also, for many people, a full 16 hours of fasting just isnt realistic, says Cynthia Sass, a New York City and L.A.-based performance nutritionist. She recommends 12 hours of overnight fasting at most and believes the 16-hour gap is especially tough on those who exercise early in the morning or late at night. If fasting makes you feel miserable and results in intense cravings and rebound overeating, it's not the right path for you, she says.

As long as youre aware that it isnt nutritional magic, Sasson isnt against intermittent fasting altogether. Ive worked with patients who need positive reinforcement to see that their weight went down to feel better, and they feel in control for the first time, she says. That self-efficacy, that feeling that they could do itfor some, that might be important.

Of the two most popular methods, Sasson leans toward the 5:2 schedule as slightly more manageable, since youre only reducing your intake twice a week. But again, thats contingent on you being a responsible dieter on your days of lowered caloric intake, which requires an immense amount of disciplineespecially when it comes to remembering to drink water. You can go a long time without food, but only a few days without adequate hydration, she warns.

If these extended periods without delicious food sound too painful to handle, rest assured: The best available evidence indicates that a regular ol diet is at least as safe and healthy and efficacious as intermittent fasting. Besides, sooner or later, a shiny new fad is bound to come along for the A-listers to fawn over, she says: Theres going to be a new darling of the month before you know it.

via gq.com

NOW READ

How to lose weight like this guy who lost 21 kgs and became a certified nutritionist & fitness coach

How to lose weight like this guy who lost 56 kgs in 6 months after getting the biggest shock of his life

KL Rahul shares the exact fitness routine and diet that keeps him in top shape

More on Fitness

Continued here:
Is intermittent fasting really worth It? - GQ India - What a man's got to do

Size 20 fast food addict who spent 10,000 on takeaways a year halves body weight – Mirror Online

Posted: October 27, 2019 at 9:49 am

A fast food addict who devoured three takeaways every day says an NHS gastric sleeve saved her life.

Chelsey Goold claims she stopped herself from having a heart attack by halving her body weight to walk down the aisle.

The 24-year-old ate around 10,000-worth of take out a year, and would even have two dinners a night.

Chelsey, from Cumbernauld, Scotland, was so unhappy from a previous relationship she would eat curries, Big Macs and chip shop dinners to deal with her problems.

After ballooning to a size 20 and weighing 18st, she claims she struggled to walk just a few steps - and couldn't even tie her shoelaces as her waistline expanded.

Struggling to shed two stone on her own, Chelsey was referred for a gastric sleeve on the NHS.

The health and social care student eventually ended her dead-end relationship and in May 2018, she met her new husband Owen, 30, on Plenty of Fish.

With his support, she has transformed her life.

The loved-up pair tied the knot this summer, as the new confident Chelsey beamed in a size 12 dress - after halving her body weight to 9st.

She said: "Wearing my wedding dress after losing all that weight felt amazing. I was so surprised when it fit.

"Being told I looked stunning all day took a bit of getting used to, to be honest.

"After being in a one-sided relationship for years, I felt really proud of myself. Before I couldn't walk even a few steps. I can even tie my shoelaces again. I can now walk without turning red and getting out of breath.

"I saved myself from a heart attack. I'm ashamed [of how I used to be]. "Now, I feel like a normal person again and have such a healthier life."

Feeling unhappy in her relationship, Chelsey had binged on Indian takeaways and chocolate - spending up to 30 a day on greasy meals.

But as a newly single woman in May 2017, Chelsey did try to lose weight - though shedding just two stone in a year.

And when her obesity left her unable to walk just a few steps, she had a gastric sleeve fitted in September 2018.

As the months passed, she saw the weight melt away and before she knew it, she was ordering a size 16 wedding dress - something she never dreamt was possible.

Three weeks before her wedding in July this year, she was amazed to try on the beautiful gown and feel it slip over her slim frame - excitedly sending it off for alterations.

Chelsey said: "My wedding dress was ordered from America and it arrived just four weeks before the wedding. It was altered around three weeks before the big day to a size 12.

"On the day I felt amazing. I have much more self worth. Now I have the support of a wonderful husband and feel a lot better about myself. The surgery changed a lot. I've got the support I need now and I know anything is possible.

"I had to re-program my brain when it came to food and I've learnt a lot. I'm at my target weight now and will be keeping at it."

When she first started her search of love more than a year ago, Chelsey never imagined she would be settling down into married life already.

But she admits finding love and being able to rely on Owen possibly saved her life.

Chelsey said: "I have always had problems with my weight and due to the situation with my ex, it was made worse. The relationship triggered me to put on weight.

"I left my ex and went on dating sites. I joined Plenty of Fish and which is where I met Owen.

"When I joined it I was so self conscious. Dating online is difficult as it is and people tend to be on it for just one thing.

"It feels so good to go to the shops and pick any clothes you want, knowing they'll fit."

More here:
Size 20 fast food addict who spent 10,000 on takeaways a year halves body weight - Mirror Online


Page 1,319«..1020..1,3181,3191,3201,321..1,3301,340..»