Search Weight Loss Topics:

Page 948«..1020..947948949950..960970..»

Who We Are As Eaters? – Thrive Global

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:48 am

Most of us have been taught to believe that good nutrition is simply a function of eating the right food and taking the right supplements. Of course, this is true, but theres more to the equation. What we eat is only half the story of good nutrition.

The other half of the story is who we are as eaters. That is, what we think, feel, believe, as well as our levels of stress, relaxation, pleasure, awareness, and the inner stories that we live out all have a real, powerful, and scientific effect on nutritional metabolism.

Recent advances in the mind-body sciences have been proving what ancient wisdom traditions have been saying for eons that the mind and body exist on an exquisite continuum, and profoundly impact one another.

So the good news is simply this: you can powerfully change your health and your nutritional status without changing anything you eat, but by changing you the eater.

Consider some of these key secrets that I think everyone should know:

Stress can put weight on relaxation can take it offIts fascinating how stress, fear, anxiety, anger, judgment, and even negative self-talk can literally create a physiologic stress response in the body. This means that we generate more cortisol and insulin, two hormones that have the unwanted effect of signaling the body to store weight, store fat, and stop building muscle. Strange as it may sound, we quite literally change our calorie burning capacity when were stressed. Whats more incredible though, is that, as we learn to smile more, ease into life, and breathe more deeply, the body enters a physiologic relaxation response. In this state, we actually create our optimal day-in, day-out calorie-burning metabolism. So, you could be following the best weight loss diet in the world, but if youre an anxious mess, the power of your mind is limiting the weight loss of your body. Far too many people adopt stressful weight loss strategies; impossible-to-follow diets, overly intense exercise programs, tasteless food, and extremely low-calorie meal plans, all of which can create the kind of stress chemistry that ensures our weight will stay put. Its time to relax into weight loss.

Happiness is the best digestive aidCan you recall what happens when you eat during anxiety or stress? Many people report such symptoms as heartburn, cramping, gas, and digestive upset. During stress, the body automatically shifts into the classic fight-or-flight response. This feature of the nervous system evolved over millions of years as a brilliant safety mechanism to support us during life-threatening events. At the moment the stress response is activated, something very interesting happens the digestive system shuts down. It makes perfect sense that when youre fending off an angry gorilla, you dont need to waste energy digesting your breakfast. All the bodys metabolic energy is directed towards survival. So, you could be eating the healthiest food in the universe, but if you arent eating under the optimum state of digestion and assimilation, which happens to be relaxation, you literally and metabolically are not receiving the full nutritional value of your meal.

Overeating its simpler than you thinkMost people think they overeat because they have a willpower problem. If only I could control my appetite, then I would stop being such a willpower weakling and start losing weight. Well, heres the good news you dont have a willpower problem. The problem for the majority of overeaters is that they dont actually eat when they eat. What Im suggesting is that we arent always fully present to the meal, aware of its taste, eating it slowly, or simply feeling nourished by the food. When this happens, the brain, which requires taste and satisfaction, misses out on a key phase of the nutritional experience. The brain literally thinks it didnt eat or didnt eat enough. And it simply screams back at us Hungry! So, you can dramatically decrease your overeating by increasing your awareness and presence at every meal.

Slower eating means a faster metabolismOne of my favourite nutritional questions to ask a client or student is are you a fast eater, moderate eater, or slow eater? If the answer is fast, then its time for an overhaul. Thats because the act of eating fast is considered a stressor by the body. Humans are simply not biologically wired for high-speed eating. So when we do eat fast, the body once again enters the physiologic stress response, which results in decreased digestion, decreased nutrient assimilation, increased nutrient excretion, lowered calorie-burning rate, and a bigger appetite. The bottom line is that you can literally empower your nutritional metabolism simply by slowing down. Whats fascinating is that for many fast eaters, slowing down is quite a challenge. But try this dont just eat slow eat sensuously, feel nourished by your food, and take in all the sensations of your meal.

Make sure you have enough Vitamin P Pleasure!Far too many people are taught to believe that pleasure is something frivolous. Well, its actually required by our biology. All organisms on planet earth, be they lion, lizard, amoeba, or human, are programmed at the most primitive level of the nervous system to seek pleasure and avoid pain. Well, if youre eating and not paying attention, the brain will drive you to seek more pleasure via overeating. Whats worse, if youre stressed while eating, the excess cortisol in your system actually de-sensitises us to pleasure so youll need to eat more food in order to get the pleasure we are seeking. The bottom line is this: If you want more pleasure from food, you dont need to eat more of the ice cream. Simply breathe, relax, de-stress, enjoy, and pay attention and the body will naturally experience the pleasure it seeks. And the great news is, since pleasure catalyses a relaxation response, it actually fuels digestion and assimilation.

Emotional eating its not the enemyAt our core, we are emotional beings rich, complex, juicy, unpredictable, feeling-filled creatures. We love, we celebrate, we laugh, cry, we break down, we rise up So how could we NOT be emotional eaters? We love food. We love our favourite restaurant. We love how food makes us feel good. Some of us love cooking for others. Some of us are passionate about nutrition. Its time to get over it if youre human, you will bring emotionality to the table. Once we embrace the reality that were genetically hard-wired for emotional expression we can relax a little more. Underneath the quest to eradicate emotional eating from ones life is often found a hidden desire to eliminate uncomfortable feelings. We strive for the impossible; to attain goals that constantly leave us frustrated and in failure. Yes, this thing called emotional eating can be very painful. But its not the actual problem, its a symptom thats pointing to something deeper. Its an alert mechanism from our bodys wisdom thats calling us to check-in, and follow the flow of emotions within us to see where our soul is calling for more awareness and insight.

Get rid of toxic nutritional beliefsFinally, many of us have absorbed toxic nutritional beliefs that are as harmful and debilitating as any of the toxins in our food. Heres what I mean: its surprisingly common for people to believe that food is the enemy, or food makes me fat, or fat in food will become fat on my body or my appetite is the enemy or as soon as I have the perfect body, then Ill finally be happy. Such beliefs may seem harmless, yet they can create a relationship with food thats filled with tremendous suffering and pain. Think about it if food is the enemy, then we are constantly in a fight or flight stress response whenever we eat or even think about food. Such a powerful stressor can cause all the problems of a stress-induced digestive shutdown, decreased calorie-burning capacity, and an inner life thats seldom at peace. The question is: Is your relationship with food nourishing, or punishing?

Lets bring back the joy of food. And the more we include a well rounded nutritional profile Vitamin R relaxation, Vitamin P pleasure, Vitamin S slow, and Vitamin L love the more we can literally nourish ourselves on every level.

written by Marc David and adapted by Michele Chevalley Hedge, Published on A Healthy View

Go here to read the rest:
Who We Are As Eaters? - Thrive Global

Core training isn’t just a buzzwordit helps nurses at home and on the job – Atlanta Journal Constitution

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:48 am

So many aspects of a workout can help nurses stay fit for their work duties, fromrunning to stretching to lifting weights. But one form of fitness has extra benefits: core strength training.

RELATED: 9 weight loss tips for busy nurses

Nurses encounter many of the common causes of back pain on the job described by theMayo Clinic. In particular, nurses may exert too much force on their backs and cause injury, "such as by lifting or moving heavy objects," according to Mayo. "Repeating certain movements, especially those that involve twisting or rotating your spine, can injure your back." An inactive job or a desk job can contribute... especially if you have poor posture or sit all day in a chair with inadequate back support."

The most recentstatistics drawn from Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2016 underline other physical issues for nurses on the job. According to that data, 51% of all injuries and illnesses to RNs resulted in sprains, strains, or tears and on average took seven off-work days for healing. Another 27.7% of lost-time cases resulted from RN back injuries.

Core strength is simply the best preventive for all of these possible injuries, and it helps nurses with their stamina and maintaining positive energy levels, too. "To think of the core's importance, think of its location," urged Robert Dothard, a professional trainer who particularly focuses on families and clients ages 35-60 atFit Family Smyrna. "Two of the worst injuries for nurses or any adult who wants to stay fit are the shoulder, which eliminates your ability to do all upper body exercises, or the hips, which eliminate all lower body exercises. Your core muscles link your shoulder muscle groups to the ones in the hips and thighs, so that core area is vital for your body to function."

RELATED:After losing 70 pounds, this nurse is ready for her first AJC Peachtree Road Race

A former trainer on "Biggest Loser" and the creator of Total Body Workout DVDs, Dothard has made core training a priority at Fit Family for more than a decade and urges nurses to focus on core strength to help them meet the physical demands of the job without courting injuries...

Astudy from the journal Sports Health also hailed the benefits of core stability, saying "multifaceted prevention programs including core stabilization exercises appear to be effective at reducing lower extremity injury rates.... Substantial evidence exists demonstrating core muscle recruitment alterations in low back pain (LBP) patients compared with healthy controls."

To tap those benefits for yourself, either with a trainer, in a class or on your own, first focus on understanding what the core is and how it affects your every motion,Harvard Medical School urged.

RELATED:Nursing and nutrition: How do you take care of yourself when you take care of others most of the time?

"Whether you're hitting a tennis ball or mopping the floor, the necessary motions either originate in your core, or move through it," the HMS health website explained. "Weak or inflexible core muscles can impair how well your arms and legs function. And that saps power from many of the moves you make. Properly building up your core cranks up the power. A strong core also enhances balance and stability. Thus, it can help prevent falls and injuries during sports or other activities. In fact, a strong, flexible core underpins almost everything you do."

And it's not only work that involves lifting, twisting or standing that becomes easier with core strength, HMS added. "Less obvious tasks like sitting at your desk for hours engage your core as well. Phone calls, typing, computer use, and similar work can make back muscles surprisingly stiff and sore, particularly if you're not strong enough to practice good posture and aren't taking sufficient breaks."

Core muscle strength comes to the rescue here, too, according to Harvard. "Weak core muscles contribute to slouching. Good posture trims your silhouette and projects confidence. More importantly, it lessens wear and tear on the spine and allows you to breathe deeply. Good posture helps you gain full benefits from the effort you put into exercising, too."

Yes, you'll still need aerobic exercise: Core strength training will never be a substitute for that. But the Mayo Clinic recommended combining such swimming or Zuumba classes "with exercises that strengthen and stretch your back muscles and abdomen."

A good place to start is with some of the exercisesfirefighters use for core conditioning. Firefighters share many job-related risks for injury and stress with nurses, and Wisconsin firefighter and training officerAaron Zamzowrecommended these exercises in Firehouse for people who want to build core strength and avoid back injuries and strengthen their spines:

Half-kneeling hip flexor stretch

"Always try to start workouts with this exercise," Firehouse recommended. "The hip flexors are a group of muscles that connect your femur (thigh bone) to your pelvis (hip bone) and lower back." Do this first, Milwaukee physical therapist Luis Rivera told Firehouse. Tight hips inhibit your glutes from firing, which puts a lot of strain on the back, he says. Stretching the hip flexor helps to activate the glutes and opens the hips.

Dead Bugs

The name is not coincidental. You will look like a dead bug flailing around, but it's important, Rivera added. "Often athletes cannot raise their arms overhead or move their hips without engaging or arching the muscles of the lower back, which places undo stress on the spine. The Dead Bug fixes these issues by teaching you to isolate movement at the hips and shoulders without moving your spine."

Glute Bridging

Don't overlook the gluteus maximus, medius and minimus when you're striving for core fitness, Rivera advised. "Individuals with weak glutes are more susceptible to back injury because the muscles of the low back must compensate. This compensation can lead to pain and injury if not addressed. Rivera explains: The muscles of the glutes ... help control movements of the torso, pelvis, hips and legs, so it is imperative that they are working properly.

Support real journalism. Support local journalism. Subscribe to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution today. See offers.

Your subscription to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution funds in-depth reporting and investigations that keep you informed. Thank you for supporting real journalism.

Originally posted here:
Core training isn't just a buzzwordit helps nurses at home and on the job - Atlanta Journal Constitution

Healthier Foods to Eat for Weight Loss and Better CrossFit Training – BOXROX

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:48 am

When you train, without the right nutrition and healthier foods to assist recovery and fuel performance, you will simply not perform and developaccording to your full potential.

Often it can be counter-productive if people try to make too many unsustainable changes too quickly. It must be done in a way that allows new habits to genuinely form. This articles proposes additions, rather than negations, in your nutrition in order to support positive habits.

Try adding the following healthier foods into your nutrition.

Not just are they absolutely delicious, but they can help you take care of your aching muscles as well. They also help in the production of sleep hormones that help you rest better.

Who doesnt love a big bowl of colourful berries?!? Berries are regularly touted as a superfood and for good reason. They are full on anthocyanins, fibre, polyphenols and vitamins which help supercharge your recovery. Berries can be eaten anytime but may be of particular use when you are in an intense training cycle and need all the support you can get.

How to use

Vitamin C is critical for your skin, scar tissues, and blood vessels to heal themselves. Since the body cant make vitamin C on its own, consuming citrus fruits will ensure that you are pumping in enough of it for your body to fix itself.Vitamin C helps to strengthen the immune system, assist the rate at which we can absorb iron and is an important antioxidant that regenerates other antioxidants within the body. The reduction of stress is a side function, but this helps you to stay relaxed and recover from high intensity training.

Train hard and recover properly

You can easily cover your vitamin C demand with foods like:

Supplements are not necessarily required. The daily demand of vitamin C amounts 100 mg (equal to one kiwi). The human body can neither store vitamin C nor produce it, so it is absolutely essential as a part of your diet. Symptoms of a deficiency are easy bruising and bleeding, joint and muscle pain and a weakened immune system.

Originally posted here:
Healthier Foods to Eat for Weight Loss and Better CrossFit Training - BOXROX

Gemma Collins boasts about flying first class as she shows off three stone weight loss on Dubai holiday – The Sun

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:48 am

GEMMA Collins has boasted about flying first class as she shows off her three stone weight loss on a lavish Dubai holiday.

The reality TV queen posted a snap showing off her shrinking figure with the caption: "Do I look like I travel Economy?"

4

The 39-year-old - who claims to be worth 5million - treated herself to a luxurious holiday before she starts filming for series two of Diva Forever.

She has maintained her weight loss since using skinny jabs after her stint on Dancing On Ice last year.

And she looked more confident than ever wearing a floor-length dress that accentuated her smaller waist.

The star completed the summery look with gold shades, jewellery and sandals, and she showed off her newly cropped hair in a close-up selfie.

4

Her skin glowed with a healthy tan, and Gemma admitted she was feeling good when she posted the photos.

Towie star Gemma has recently lost two stone, which she puts down to her devotion to controversial Skinny jab injections.

And she unveiled a startling new look after undergoing an extreme makeover, showing off a very short haircut.

She looked almost unrecognisable and fans bombarded the star with praise on Instagram, with Love Island winner Amber Gill squealing: "Gemma!!."

Several others reckoned she looked like a member of America's most famous family, branding her "Khloe Karadashian U.K. ".

4

Gemma took her break to Dubai after filming an eventful appearance on The Big Narstie Show - but left because "the whole studio stank of weed".

A source told The Sun Online: Things took a strange turn when Big Narstie fell asleep and started laughing to himself.

4

ICE BREAKINGLove Island's Maura Higgins and Curtis Pritchard split seven months after show

KERRY EXCITINGKerry Katona moves into new mansion with toyboy and her five kids

CHANGE OF HEARTCan you work out who this former sex symbol TV star and singer is?

Exclusive

JERK BLACKJack Black is a pig-faced, horrendous, c**k, d**k & a******e says Vernon Kay

platt no moreJack Shepherd says Tina OBrien has been booted out of Platts' WhatsApp group

FAIRYTALE ROMANCELove Island's Siannise Fudge and Luke T FINALLY going to Disneyland Paris

trouble in paradiseLove Island's Sophie and Connor spark split fears

PEEKABRAChristine McGuinness sizzles in black stockings and corset

Exclusive

what the cluck?Corrie hit with 359 Ofcom complaints as Geoff makes Yasmeen eat pet chicken

ISLE LOVE YOULove Island's Callum and Molly look loved up as they leave fashion offices

" The production team were forced to rush on to try and wake him up so filming could continue.

At this point Gemma was completely baffled by what was going on and so while all this madness was going on she decided to go outside for some fresh air.

Explaining she was on the show with Vinnie Jones, the insider added: "They are both big stars with busy lives so werent happy about hanging around for Big Narstie to wake up."

Read the rest here:
Gemma Collins boasts about flying first class as she shows off three stone weight loss on Dubai holiday - The Sun

Weight loss story: ‘My parents found it difficult to find the right match for me’ – Times of India

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:48 am

27-year-old Pallavi Gupta was at the receiving end of lots of negative comments and faced several health troubles owing to the excess weight. Determined to reverse this, this homemaker joined a gym, worked hard and lost 20 kilos in less than a year.To know how she did it, read the complete story below:Name: Pallavi GuptaOccupation: Homemaker (CA Finalist)

Age: 27

Height:5 feet 5 inches

City: Saharanpur (Uttar Pradesh)

Highest weight recorded: 84 kilos

Weight lost: 20 kilos approximately

Duration it took me to lose weight:10 monthsThe turning point: I piled on weight quickly. I lost out on self-confidence and felt ignored by the people around me. After a point, my parents got tensed as they found it difficult to find a suitable match for me. This was when I decided to change my lifestyle and got better. With luck by my side, I was able to shed 19-20 kilos in less than a year.

My breakfast: For breakfast, I like having a vegetable sandwich (preferably brown bread/multigrain) or something filling like oats, chilla or poha, with a cup of coffee or tea.

My lunch: I like to have a simple homemade lunch. One chapati with a serving of subzi and daal (green moong/yellow urad/moong/beans/chickpeas). Salad and curd are optional.

In the evenings, I like to snack on makhane (foxnuts), chaane (Bengal gram) and a cup of green tea.

My dinner: I keep my dinner light. Usually, I have a bowl of fruit salad (with just some black pepper and lemon seasoning), or a big bowl of subzi, whatever's made at home.

Pre-workout meal: Black coffee

Post- workout meal: Handful of dry fruits( 4 soaked almonds, 2 raisins, 1 anjeer 1 and walnut )

My workout: I like to work out for 1.5 hours at a stretch, focussing on every individual muscle and start by doing cardio for 40 minutes daily. Then, I spend 30 minutes on the treadmill or the cross-trainer.

Planks are my favourite exercise to do and I also perform 200 reps of sides with bar, 3 sets of jumping jacks, mountain climber, step-ups. I also like to cycle, if and when I find the time.

I worked out under a gym trainer and focussed on a target area every day:

Monday :- Chest & bicepsTuesday:- LegsWednesday;- Back & tricepsThursday:- abs & shouldersFriday :- HIIT workout & cardioSaturday:- legs( calves/ hams/thighs)Sundays are my rest day.

Low-calorie recipes I swear by: Special cold coffee recipe (1 cup milk+ 2 soaked anjeer +2 soaked almonds+ 1 dry date + coffee powder) is a weight loss secret. I also like eating vegetable khichdi.

Fitness secrets I unveiled: Moderation is the key. I followed a variation of intermittent fasting. Changing my portion size greatly helped me.

How do I stay motivated? - I would like to credit my husband as the biggest motivator. We have been married for 4 months now and he helps me stick to my goals and not give up.

Continue reading here:
Weight loss story: 'My parents found it difficult to find the right match for me' - Times of India

Weight loss: I lost 3st after my daughter pointed at my obese tummy and asked if I was having a baby – The Sun

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:48 am

AS her little girl pointed at her obese tummy and asked if she was pregnant, India Faulkner-Wiley's heart dropped.

The mum-of-two, 38, knew she'd piled on the pounds after developing an unhealthy addiction to takeaways and sweet treats.

7

And she'd ballooned to nearly 12 stone and a dress size 16 after becoming a mum to her children Jazmine, 13, and Saffron, five.

But it was at that moment when Jazmine asked if she was having another baby that India knew she desperately needed to make a change and lose weight.

The former teacher, from Morecambe, Lancs, decided to sign up to Slimming World and has since shed an impressive three stone.

She said: Ive dropped four dress sizes and love the fact I can choose fashionable clothes straight off the rails rather than knowing they wont fit me right.

I am so proud of the shape Im in and, as a mum, I feel passionate about being a positive role model.

7

7

India had always struggled with her weight since her teens but never knew how to lose weight.

She said: "The first time I realised my weight was a problem was when I was just 16.

"Id just been given a place at a performing-arts school and I was bigger than most of the other pupils.

"I had to no idea what to do about it, so I failed to lose any weight.

Id get self-conscious about my growing weight

"I went to university from college and became a teacher after I graduated.

"I fell into a routine and would eat snacks every time the kids had break time, then be so tired by the end of the day I would pick up a takeaway or a ready meal on the way home.

"I had regular glasses of wine in the week and rarely thought about fruit and vegetables.

"Every now and then, Id get self-conscious about my growing weight and try a fad diet you name it, I tried it.

"But even if I did shed weight, it wasnt much and it never stayed off."

7

India continued to get bigger as she gave birth to her two children and went through a divorce in 2007.

"I got married at 22 and, after crash-dieting for two months, I walked down the aisle as a size 10 weighing 9.5st," India said.

"A year later I fell pregnant and I used pregnancy as an excuse to put my weight firmly to the back of my mind.

"Jazmine was born in September 2006 and I gained 4st, taking me to 13.5st and a size 16."I told myself it was normal as a new mum.

7

"A year later, my husband and I divorced. Im definitely an emotional eater and this difficult time saw me reach for junk food.

"Sweets, takeaways and chips were my go-to foods and the weight piled on.

"I eventually moved on with a new relationship in 2010. I felt happy and secure and I fell back in love with food and my unhealthy habits.

Sweets, takeaways and chips were my go-to foods

"When I fell pregnant again, history repeated itself and the weight piled on.

"Saffron was born in May 2014, four weeks early, at home at 2am. It was a stressful time and, again, I forgot about my weight gain."

India ignored her growing waistline until a comment from one of her children gave her an extra incentive to slim down.

7

Speaking about her wake-up call, India added: "It was only when, four months after the birth, Jazmine pointed at my tummy and asked if I was going to have another baby I realised I needed to change. Not with a fad diet but for good.

"An old friend had lost 5st in a year with Slimming World. Id seen her transformation photos on Facebook and was amazed.

"I asked her about what she was eating and she said shed never felt hungry the whole time."

India found her local group and brought along her mum Susan, 72, for moral support.

"All the food looked delicious and, in the first week alone, I lost 4.5lb," India said.

7

"I loved all the recipes and pre-prepared my lunches so I had healthy food and snacks with me at all times.

"As the weight fell off, my confidence grew and, after two months, I started introducing Body Magic the Slimming World activity programme into my life, too.

"At first, I built more exercise into my normal day.

"I walked instead of driving and used a tracker to count my steps.

Since then, Ive joined a gym and enjoy regular spin classes, too."

India has now lost three stone and dropped four dress-sizes - and loves the fact she can now shop in high-street stores.

WEIGH HEYFormer air hostess says weight loss 'cured' asthma as she reveals transformation

WEIGH TO GORevenge body mum shamed for dealbreaker legs by ex now loves 'thunder thighs'

TOP PRIZEWoman, 26, crowned Miss Great Britain after shedding HALF her body weight

massive no murOlly Murs shows off his incredible weight loss in just ONE month

Exclusive

WEIGH-HEYI was a size 24 but I've finally got my sex drive back after losing 8st in a year

TAKES THE CAKEWoman loses 10st after dream job at a food company made her balloon to 23st

SOMEONE LIKE NEWAdele weight loss - how did the singer lose weight?

WEIGHT OFFI lost 10st after piling on weight after the deaths of my parents and brother

SECRET'S OUTKerry Katona reveals how she got her new ripped six-pack & slimmed down to 9st

"Even though my relationship didnt work out, being healthy and happy with my weight has helped me remain confident," India said.

"My friends and family have noticed such a massive difference in me and Im so proud of the shape Im in.

"As a mum, I feel passionate about being a positive role model."

Read the original post:
Weight loss: I lost 3st after my daughter pointed at my obese tummy and asked if I was having a baby - The Sun

Weight Loss Tips: Can Heavy Breakfast Help You Burn Double The Calories? Here’s The Answer – NDTV

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:48 am

A heavy breakfast can help you burn more calories

Breakfast is considered as the most important meal of the day. It is advised to consume maximum calories at breakfast as you are more likely to burn these throughout the day. Breakfast also affects your metabolism. Better metabolism results in effective weight loss. Studies have also highlighted that consuming a heavy break may help you prevent obesity and promotes healthy blood sugar levels as well. If you are skipping breakfast too often, you must make healthy changes in your diet immediately. To explain the importance of heavy breakfast, here are some details straight from our expert that will motivate you to consume a healthy breakfast daily.

Dietician, Priyanka Aggarwal explains, "A heavy and healthy breakfast is extremely healthy for you. It can burn double the calories. A heavy breakfast can help you burn more calories. Studies have also observed that people who consume heavy breakfast burn more calories than those who don't. This usually happens because at night you are at the fasting mode which makes you burn more calories in the morning. If you want to maintain a healthy weight you will burn more calories."

Add enough protein to your breakfastPhoto Credit: iStock

"But if you are working in nigh shifts then it is advised to follow the opposite routine. When working in night shifts you need to burn more calories at night as compared to the day. So, for such cases, a light breakfast and heavy dinner is recommended."

Also read:Weight Loss: Try These High Protein Breakfast Options Which Can Help You Lose Weight

"One should combine all the necessary nutrients on breakfast for optimum energy throughout the day. Add enough amount of protein and carbs so that you have enough energy to function throughout the day and you will burn more calories. You can also add more nuts and dried fruits to your breakfast," Dt. Priyanka adds.

Add nuts to your breakfast to make it rich in different nutrientsPhoto Credit: iStock

Also read:Did You Have Fresh, Homemade Breakfast Today? Why Rujuta Diwekar Recommends Doing This Daily

(Priyanka Aggarwal, Consultant, Dietetics, Max Multi Speciality Centre, Noida)

Disclaimer: This content including advice provides generic information only. It is in no way a substitute for qualified medical opinion. Always consult a specialist or your own doctor for more information. NDTV does not claim responsibility for this information.

The rest is here:
Weight Loss Tips: Can Heavy Breakfast Help You Burn Double The Calories? Here's The Answer - NDTV

Insurgent Wilson Reveals Off Her Weight Loss & Slimmer Waist In Tiny Ski Outfit Pics – BingePost

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:47 am

Drake shocked many followers when he appeared to name his one-year-old son Adonis mom, Sophie Brussaux, a fluke in his new track When To Say When they usually took to Twitter to precise their opinions.

Drake, 33, obtained the eye of many Twitter customers on Mar. 2 when one of many lyrics in his new track When To Say When appeared to shade Sophie Brussaux, 30, the mom of his one-year-old son Adonis. Within the monitor, the rapper addresses his child mama and the way he feels about her. Child mama fluke, however I really like her for who she is the lyric says. Though he didnt name her by title, since he solely has one son, followers realized that he almost definitely meant Sophie and didnt maintain again on expressing their disappointment.

I simply heard that track on the radio the place Drake known as his child mama a fluke hes a really insecure man, one tweet learn. I like drake however calling his child mama a fluke ??? You a hoe drake, one other learn. Drake known as his child mama a fluke, I hope he is aware of that makes him a fluke too. Hes a POS, a 3rd tweet learn.

Not all Twitter customers have been indignant about Drakes lyrics although and a few even defended him. Drake mentioned his Child Mama a fluke & yall mad Lol Im positive he can name her no matter he desires she nonetheless smiling & flossing to the financial institution each month, one carefree tweet learn. Yall nervous about drake calling his child mama fluke however yall be getting known as bitches and smacked round by yall boyfriends each day Face with tears of joyFace with tears of joyFace with tears of pleasure, one other daring tweet learn.

Drakes line about his child mama in his new track comes as considerably of a shock contemplating that though he and Sophie, whos an artist, are not romantically concerned, they get alongside nicely. The doting mom, who primarily lives in France, has been noticed in Drakes hometown of Toronto, Canada greater than as soon as over the previous few months they usually have by no means publicly talked about one another in a adverse gentle earlier than Drakes newest monitor was launched on Feb. 29.

Sophie has but to talk out in regards to the line in Drakes new track, however well be looking out to see if she does. Within the meantime, were hoping these two are on good phrases for the sake of their son!

Read more from the original source:
Insurgent Wilson Reveals Off Her Weight Loss & Slimmer Waist In Tiny Ski Outfit Pics - BingePost

Nuclear Tests Marked Life on Earth With a Radioactive Spike – The Atlantic

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:47 am

On the morning of March 1, 1954, a hydrogen bomb went off in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. John Clark was only 20 miles away when he issued the order, huddled with his crew inside a windowless concrete blockhouse on Bikini Atoll. But seconds went by, and all was silent. He wondered if the bomb had failed. Eventually, he radioed a Navy ship monitoring the test explosion.

Its a good one, they told him.

Then the blockhouse began to lurch. At least one crew member got seasicklandsick might be the better descriptor. A minute later, when the bomb blast reached them, the walls creaked and water shot out of the bathroom pipes. And then, once more, nothing. Clark waited for another impactperhaps a tidal wavebut after 15 minutes he decided it was safe for the crew to venture outside.

The mushroom cloud towered into the sky. The explosion, dubbed Castle Bravo, was the largest nuclear-weapons test up to that point. It was intended to try out the first hydrogen bomb ready to be dropped from a plane. Many in Washington felt that the future of the free world depended on it, and Clark was the natural pick to oversee such a vital blast. He was the deputy test director for the Atomic Energy Commission, and had already participated in more than 40 test shots. Now he gazed up at the cloud in awe. But then his Geiger counter began to crackle.

It could mean only one thing, Clark later wrote. We were already getting fallout.

That wasnt supposed to happen. The Castle Bravo team had been sure that the radiation from the blast would go up to the stratosphere or get carried away by the winds safely out to sea. In fact, the chain reactions unleashed during the explosion produced a blast almost three times as big as predicted1,000 times bigger than the Hiroshima bomb.

Within seconds, the fireball had lofted 10 million tons of pulverized coral reef, coated in radioactive material. And soon some of that deadly debris began dropping to Earth. If Clark and his crew had lingered outside, they would have died in the fallout.

Clark rushed his team back into the blockhouse, but even within the thick walls, the level of radiation was still climbing. Clark radioed for a rescue but was denied: It would be too dangerous for the helicopter pilots to come to the island. The team hunkered down, wondering if they were being poisoned to death. The generators failed, and the lights winked out.

We were not a happy bunch, Clark recalled.

They spent hours in the hot, radioactive darkness until the Navy dispatched helicopters their way. When the crew members heard the blades, they put on bedsheets to protect themselves from fallout. Throwing open the blockhouse door, they ran to nearby jeeps as though they were in a surreal Halloween parade, and drove half a mile to the landing pad. They clambered into the helicopters, and escaped over the sea.

Read: The people who built the atomic bomb

As Clark and his crew found shelter aboard a Navy ship, the debris from Castle Bravo rained down on the Pacific. Some landed on a Japanese fishing boat 70 miles away. The winds then carried it to three neighboring atolls. Children on the island of Rongelap played in the false snow. Five days later, Rongelap was evacuated, but not before its residents had received a near-lethal dose of radiation. Some people suffered burns, and a number of women later gave birth to severely deformed babies. Decades later, studies would indicate that the residents experienced elevated rates of cancer.

The shocking power of Castle Bravo spurred the Soviet Union to build up its own nuclear arsenal, spurring the Americans in turn to push the arms race close to global annihilation. But the news reports of sick Japanese fishermen and Pacific islanders inspired a worldwide outcry against bomb tests. Nine years after Clark gave the go-ahead for Castle Bravo, the United States, Soviet Union, and Great Britain signed a treaty to ban aboveground nuclear-weapons testing. As for Clark, he returned to the United States and lived for another five decades, dying in 2002 at age 98.

Among the isotopes created by a thermonuclear blast is a rare, radioactive version of carbon, called carbon 14. Castle Bravo and the hydrogen-bomb tests that followed it created vast amounts of carbon 14, which have endured ever since. A little of this carbon 14 made its way into Clarks body, into his blood, his fat, his gut, and his muscles. Clark carried a signature of the nuclear weapons he tested to his grave.

I can state this with confidence, even though I did not carry out an autopsy on Clark. I know this because the carbon 14 produced by hydrogen bombs spread over the entire world. It worked itself into the atmosphere, the oceans, and practically every living thing. As it spread, it exposed secrets. It can reveal when we were born. It tracks hidden changes to our hearts and brains. It lights up the cryptic channels that join the entire biosphere into a single network of chemical flux. This man-made burst of carbon 14 has been such a revelation that scientists refer to it as the bomb spike. Only now is the bomb spike close to disappearing, but as it vanishes, scientists have found a new use for it: to track global warming, the next self-inflicted threat to our survival.

Sixty-five years after Castle Bravo, I wanted to see its mark. So I drove to Cape Cod, in Massachusetts. I was 7,300 miles from Bikini Atoll, in a cozy patch of New England forest on a cool late-summer day, but Clarks blast felt close to me in both space and time.

I made my way to the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, where I met Mary Gaylord, a senior research assistant. She led me to the lounge of Maclean Hall. Outside the window, dogwoods bloomed. Next to the Keurig coffee maker was a refrigerator with the sign that read STORE ONLY FOOD IN THIS REFRIGERATOR. We had come to this ordinary spot to take a look at something extraordinary. Next to the refrigerator was a massive section of tree trunk, as wide as a dining-room table, resting on a pallet.

The beech tree from which this slab came from was planted around 1870, by a Boston businessman named Joseph Story Fay near his summer house in Woods Hole. The seedling grew into a towering, beloved fixture in the village. Lovelorn initials scarred its broad base. And then, after nearly 150 years, it started to rot from bark disease and had to come down.

They had to have a ceremony to say goodbye to it. It was a very sad day, Gaylord said. And I saw an opportunity.

Gaylord is an expert at measuring carbon 14. Before the era of nuclear testing, carbon 14 was generated outside of labs only by cosmic rays falling from space. They crashed into nitrogen atoms, and out of the collision popped a carbon 14 atom. Just one in 1 trillion carbon atoms in the atmosphere was a carbon 14 isotope. Fays beech took carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere to build wood, and so it had the same one-in-a-trillion proportion.

When Gaylord got word that the tree was coming down in 2015, she asked for a cross-section of the trunk. Once it arrived at the institute, she and two college students carefully counted its rings. Looking at the tree, I could see a line of pinholes extending from the center to the edge of the trunk. Those were the places where Gaylord and her students used razor blades to carve out bits of wood. In each sample, they measured the level of radiocarbon.

In the end, we got what I hoped for, she said. What shed hoped for was a history of our nuclear era.

For most of the trees life, they found, the level had remained steady from one year to the next. But in 1954, John Clark initiated an extraordinary climb. The new supply of radiocarbon atoms in the atmosphere over Bikini Atoll spread around the world. When it reached Woods Hole, Fays beech tree absorbed the bomb radiocarbon in its summer leaves and added it to its new ring of wood.

As nuclear testing accelerated, Fays beech took on more radiocarbon. A graph pinned to the wall above the beech slab charts the changes. In less than a decade, the level of radiocarbon in the trees outermost rings nearly doubled to almost two parts per trillion. But not long after the signing of the Partial Test Ban Treaty in 1963, that climb stopped. After a peak in 1964, each new ring of wood in Fays beech carried a little less radiocarbon. The fall was far slower than the climb. The level of radiocarbon in the last ring the beech grew before getting cut down was only 6 percent above the radiocarbon levels before Castle Bravo. Versions of the same sawtoothlike peak Gaylord drew had already been found in other parts of the world, including the rings of trees in New Zealand and the coral reefs of the Galapagos Islands. In October 2019, Gaylord unveiled an exquisitely clear version of the bomb spike in New England.

When scientists first discovered radiocarbon, in 1940, they did not find it in a tree or any other part of nature. They made it. Regular carbon has six protons and six neutrons. At UC Berkeley, Martin Kamen and Sam Ruben blasted carbon with a beam of neutrons and produced a new form, with eight neutrons instead of six. Unlike regular carbon, these new atoms turned out to be a source of radiation. Every second, a small portion of the carbon 14 atoms decayed into nitrogen, giving off radioactive particles. Kamen and Ruben used that rate of decay to estimate carbon 14s half-life at 4,000 years. Later research would sharpen that estimate to 5,700 years.

Soon after Kamen and Rubens discovery, a University of Chicago physicist named Willard Libby determined that radiocarbon existed beyond the walls of Berkeleys labs. Cosmic rays falling from space smashed into nitrogen atoms in the atmosphere every second of every day, transforming those atoms into carbon 14. And because plants and algae drew in carbon dioxide from the air, Libby realized, they should have radiocarbon in their tissue, as should the animals that eat those plants (and the animals that eat those animals, for that matter).

Libby reasoned that as long as an organism is alive and taking in carbon 14, the concentration of the isotope in its tissue should roughly match the concentration in the atmosphere. Once an organism dies, however, its radiocarbon should decay and eventually disappear completely.

To test this idea, Libby set out to measure carbon 14 in living organisms. He had colleagues go to a sewage-treatment plant in Baltimore, where they captured the methane given off by bacteria feeding on the sewage. When the methane samples arrived in Chicago, Libby extracted the carbon and put it in a radioactivity detector.. It crackled as carbon 14 decayed to nitrogen.

Read: Global warming could make carbon dating impossible

To see what happens to carbon 14 in dead tissue, Libby ran another experiment, this one with methane from oil wells. He knew that oil is made up of algae and other organisms that fell to the ocean floor and were buried for millions of years. Just as he had predicted, the methane from ancient oil contained no carbon 14 at all.

Libby then had another insight, one that would win him the Nobel Prize: The decay of carbon 14 in dead tissues acts like an archaeological clock. As the isotope decays inside a piece of wood, a bone, or some other form of organic matter, it can tell scientists how long ago that matter was alive. Radiocarbon dating, which works as far back as about 50,000 years, has revealed to us to when the Neanderthals became extinct, when farmers domesticated wheat, when the Dead Sea Scrolls were written. It has become the calendar of humanity.

Word of Libbys breakthrough reached a New Zealand physicist named Athol Rafter. He began using radiocarbon dating on the bones of extinct flightless birds and ash from ancient eruptions. To make the clock more precise, Rafter measured the level of radiocarbon in the atmosphere. Every few weeks he climbed a hill outside the city of Wellington and set down a Pyrex tray filled with lye to trap carbon dioxide.

Rafter expected the level of radiocarbon to fluctuate. But he soon discovered that something else was happening: Month after month, the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was getting more radioactive. He dunked barrels into the ocean, and he found that the amount of carbon 14 was rising in seawater as well. He could even measure extra carbon 14 in the young leaves growing on trees in New Zealand.

The Castle Bravo test and the ones that followed had to be the source. They were turning the atmosphere upside down. Instead of cosmic rays falling from space, they were sending neutrons up to the sky, creating a huge new supply of radiocarbon.

In 1957, Rafter published his results in the journal Science. The implications were immediately clearand astonishing: Man-made carbon 14 was spreading across the planet from test sites in the Pacific and the Arctic. It was even passing from the air into the oceans and trees.

Other scientists began looking, and they saw the same pattern. In Texas, the carbon 14 levels in new tree rings were increasing each year. In Holland, the flesh of snails gained more as well. In New York, scientists examined the lungs of a fresh human cadaver, and found that extra carbon 14 lurked in its cells. A living volunteer donated blood and an exhalation of air. Bomb radiocarbon was in those, too.

Bomb radiocarbon did not pose a significant threat to human healthcertainly not compared with other elements released by bombs, such as plutonium and uranium. But its accumulation was deeply unsettling nonetheless. When Linus Pauling accepted the 1962 Nobel Peace Prize for his campaigning against hydrogen bombs, he said that carbon 14 deserves our special concern because it shows the extent to which the earth is being changed by the tests of nuclear weapons.

Photos: When we tested nuclear bombs

The following year, the signing of the Partial Test Ban Treaty stopped aboveground nuclear explosions, and ended the supply of bomb radiocarbon. All told, those tests produced about 60,000 trillion trillion new atoms of carbon 14. It would take cosmic rays 250 years to make that much. In 1964, Rafter quickly saw the treatys effect: His trays of lye had less carbon 14 than they had the year before.

Only a tiny fraction of the carbon 14 was decaying into nitrogen. For the most part, the atmospheres radiocarbon levels were dropping because the atoms were rushing out of the air. This exodus of radiocarbon gave scientists an unprecedented chance to observe how nature works.

Today scientists are still learning from these man-made atoms. I feel a little bit bad about it, says Kristie Boering, an atmospheric chemist at UC Berkeley who has studied radiocarbon for more than 20 years. Its a huge tragedy, the fact that we set off all these bombs to begin with. And then we get all this interesting scientific information from it for all these decades. Its hard to know exactly how to pitch that when were giving talks. You cant get too excited about the bombs that we set off, right?

Yet the fact remains that for atmospheric scientists like Boering, bomb radiocarbon has lit up the sky like a tracer dye. When nuclear triggermen such as John Clark set off their bombs, most of the resulting carbon 14 shot up into the stratosphere directly above the impact sites. Each spring, parcels of stratospheric air gently fell down into the troposphere below, carrying with them a fresh load of carbon 14. It took a few months for these parcels to settle on weather stations on the ground. Only by following bomb radiocarbon did scientists discover this perpetual avalanche.

Once carbon 14 fell out of the stratosphere, it kept moving. The troposphere is made up of four great rings of circulating air. Inside each ring, warm air rises and flows through the sky away from the equator. Eventually it cools and sinks back to the ground, flowing toward the equator again before rising once more. At first, bomb radiocarbon remained trapped in the Northern Hemisphere rings, above where the tests had taken place. It took many years to leak through their invisible walls and move toward the tropics. After that, the annual monsoons sweeping through southern Asia pushed bomb radiocarbon over the equator and into the Southern Hemisphere.

Eventually, some of the bomb radiocarbon fell all the way to the surface of the planet. Some of it was absorbed by trees and other plants, which then died and delivered some of that radiocarbon to the soil. Other radiocarbon atoms settled into the ocean, to be carried along by its currents.

Carbon 14 is inextricably linked to our understanding of how the water moves, says Steve Beaupre, an oceanographer at Stony Brook University, in New York.

In the 1970s, marine scientists began carrying out the first major chemical surveys of the worlds oceans. They found that bomb radiocarbon had penetrated the top 1,000 meters of the ocean. Deeper than that, it became scarce. This pattern helped oceanographers figure out that the ocean, like the atmosphere above, is made up of layers of water that remain largely separate.

The warm, relatively fresh water on the surface of the ocean glides over the cold, salty depths. These surface currents become saltier as they evaporate, and eventually, at a few crucial spots on the planet, these streams get so dense that they fall to the bottom of the ocean. The bomb radiocarbon from Castle Bravo didnt start plunging down into the depths of the North Atlantic until the 1980s, when John Clark was two decades into retirement. Its still down there, where it will be carried along the seafloor by bottom-hugging ocean currents for hundreds of years before it rises to the light of day.

Some of the bomb radiocarbon that falls into the ocean makes its way into ocean life, too. Some corals grow by adding rings of calcium carbonate, and they have recorded their own version of the bomb spike. Their spike lagged well behind the one that Rafter recorded, thanks to the extra time the radiocarbon took to mix into the ocean. Algae and microbes on the surface of the ocean also take up carbon from the air, and they feed a huge food web in turn. The living things in the upper reaches of the ocean release organic carbon that falls gently to the seafloora jumble of protoplasmic goo, dolphin droppings, starfish eggs, and all manner of detritus that scientists call marine snow. In recent decades, that marine snow has become more radioactive.

In 2009, a team of Chinese researchers sailed across the Pacific and dropped traps 36,000 feet down to the bottom of the Mariana Trench. When they hauled the traps up, there were minnow-size, shrimplike creatures inside. These were Hirondellea gigas, a deep-sea invertebrate that forages on the seafloor for bits of organic carbon. The animals were flush with bomb radiocarbona puzzling discovery, because the organic carbon that sits on the floor of the Mariana Trench is thousands of years old. It was as if they had been dining at the surface of the ocean, not at its greatest depths. In a few of the Hirondellea, the researchers found undigested particles of organic carbon. These meals were also high in carbon 14.

Read: A troubling discovery in the deepest ocean trenches

The bomb radiocarbon could not have gotten there by riding the oceans conveyor belt, says Ellen Druffel, a scientist at UC Irvine who collaborated with the Chinese team. The only way you can get bomb carbon by circulation down to the deep Pacific would take 500 years, she says. Instead, Hirondellea must be dining on freshly fallen marine snow.

I must admit, when I saw the data it was really amazing, Dreffel says. These organisms were sifting out the very youngest material from the surface ocean. They were just leaving behind everything else that came down.

More than 60 years have passed since the peak of the bomb spike, and yet bomb radiocarbon is telling us new stories about the world. Thats because experts like Mary Gaylord are getting better at gathering these rare atoms. At Woods Hole, Gaylord works at the National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometry facility (NOSAMS for short). She prepares samples for analysis in a thicket of pipes, wires, glass tubes, and jars of frothing liquid nitrogen. Our whole life is vacuum lines and vacuum pumps, she told me.

At NOSAMS, Gaylord and her colleagues measure radiocarbon in all manner of things: sea spray, bat guano, typhoon-tossed trees. The day I visited, Gaylord was busy with fish eyes. Black-capped vials sat on a lab bench, each containing a bit of lens from a red snapper.

The wispy, pale tissue had come to NOSAMS from Florida. A biologist named Beverly Barnett had gotten hold of eyes from red snapper caught in the Gulf of Mexico and sliced out their lenses. Barnett then peeled away the layers of the lenses one at a time. When she describes this work, she makes it sound like woodworking or needlepointa hobby anyone would enjoy. Its like peeling off the layers of an onion, she told me. Its really nifty to see.

Eventually, Barnett made her way down to the tiny nub at the center of each lens. These bits of tissue developed when the red snapper were still in their eggs. And Barnett wanted to know exactly how much bomb radiocarbon is in these precious fragments. In a couple of days, Gaylord and her colleagues would be able to tell her.

Gaylord started by putting the lens pieces into an oven that slowly burned them away. The vapors and smoke flowed into a pipe, chased by helium and nitrogen. Gaylord separated the carbon dioxide from the other compounds, and then shunted it into chilled glass tubes. There it formed a frozen fog on the inside walls.

Later, the team at NOSAMS would transform the frozen carbon dioxide into chips of graphite, which they would then load into what looks like an enormous, crooked laser cannon. At one end of the cannon, graphite gets vaporized, and the liberated carbon atoms fly down the barrel. By controlling the magnetic field and other conditions inside the cannon, the researchers cause the carbon 14 atoms to veer away from the carbon 12 atoms and other elements. The carbon 14 atoms fly onward on their own until they strike a sensor.

Ultimately, all of this effort will end up in a number: the number of carbon 14 atoms in the red-snapper lens. For Barnett, every one of those atoms counts. They can tell her the exact age of the red snapper when the fish were caught.

Thats because lenses are peculiar organs. Most of our cells keep making new proteins and destroying old ones. Cells in the lens, however, fill up with light-bending proteins and then die, their proteins locked in place for the rest of our life. The layers of cells at the core of the red-snapper lenses have the same carbon 14 levels that they did when the fish were in their eggs.

Using lenses to estimate the ages of animals is still a new undertaking. But its already delivered some surprises. In 2016, for example, a team of Danish researchers studied the lenses from Greenland sharks ranging in size from two and a half to 16 feet long. The lenses of the sharks up to seven feet long had high levels of radiocarbon in them. That meant the sharks had hatched no earlier than the 1960s. The bigger sharks all had much lower levels of radiocarbon in their lensesmeaning that they had been born before Castle Bravo. By extrapolating out from these results, the researchers estimated that Greenland sharks have a staggeringly long life span, reaching up to 390 years or perhaps even more.

Barnett has been developing an even more precise clock for her red snapper, taking advantage of the fact that the level of bomb radiocarbon peaked in the Gulf of Mexico in the 1970s and has been falling ever since. By measuring the level of bomb radiocarbon in the center of the snapper lenses, she can determine the year when the fish hatched.

Knowing the age of fish with this kind of precision is powerful. Fishery managers can track the ages of the fish that are caught each year, information that they can then use to make sure their stocks dont collapse. Barnett wants to study fish in the Gulf of Mexico to see how they were affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill of 2010. Their eyes can tell her how old they were when they were hit by that disaster.

When it comes to carbon, we are no different than red snapper or Greenland sharks. We use the carbon in the food we eat to build our body, and the level of bomb radiocarbon inside of us reflects our age. People born in the early 1960s have more radiocarbon in their lenses than people born before that time. People born in the years since then have progressively less.

For forensic scientists who need to determine the age of skeletal remains, lenses arent much help. But teeth are. As children develop teeth, they incorporate carbon into the enamel. If peoples teeth have a very low level of radiocarbon, it means that they were born well before Castle Bravo. People born in the early 1960s have high levels of radiocarbon in their molars, which develop early, and lower levels in their wisdom teeth, which grow years later. By matching each tooth in a jaw to the bomb curve, forensic scientists can estimate the age of a skeleton to within one or two years.

Even after childhood, bomb radiocarbon chronicles the history of our body. When we build new cells, we make DNA strands out of the carbon in our food. Scientists have used bomb radiocarbon in peoples DNA to determine the age of their cells. In our brains, most of the cells form around the time were born. But many cells in our hearts and other organs are much younger.

We also build other molecules throughout our lives, including fat. In a September 2019 study, Kirsty Spalding of the Karolinska Institute, near Stockholm, used bomb radiocarbon to study why people put on weight. Researchers had long known that our level of fat is the result of how much new fat we add to our body relative to how much we burn. But they didnt have direct evidence for exactly how that balance influences our weight over the course of our life.

Spalding and her colleagues found 54 people from whom doctors had taken fat biopsies and asked if they could follow up. The fat samples spanned up to 16 years. By measuring the age of the fat in each sample, the researchers could estimate the rate at which each person added and removed fat over their lives.

The reason we put on weight as we get older, the researchers concluded, is that we get worse at removing fat from our bodies. Before, you could intuitively believe that the rate at which we burn fat decreases as we age, Spalding says, but we showed it for the first time scientifically.

Unexpectedly, though, Spalding discovered that the people who lost weight and kept it off successfully were the ones who burned their fat slowly. I was quite surprised by that data, Spalding said. It adds new and interesting biology to understanding how to help people maintain weight loss.

Children who are just now going through teething pains will have only a little more bomb radiocarbon in their enamel than children born before Castle Bravo did. Over the past six decades, the land and ocean have removed much of what nuclear bombs put into the air. Heather Graven, a climate scientist at Imperial College London, is studying this decline. It helps her predict the future of the planet.

Graven and her colleagues build models of the world to study the climate. As we emit fossil fuels, the extra carbon dioxide traps heat. How much heat were facing in centuries to come depends in part on how much carbon dioxide the oceans and land can remove. Graven can use the rise and fall of bomb radiocarbon as a benchmark to test her models.

In a recent study, she and her colleagues unleashed a virtual burst of nuclear-weapons tests. Then they tracked the fate of her simulated bomb radiocarbon to the present day. Much to Gravens relief, the radiocarbon in the atmosphere quickly rose and then gradually fell. The bomb spike in her virtual world looks much like the one recorded in Joseph Fays beech tree.

Graven can keep running her simulation beyond what Fays beech and other records tell us about the past. According to her model, the level of radiocarbon in the atmosphere should drop in 2020 to the level before Castle Bravo.

Its right around now that were crossing over, Graven told me.

Graven will have to wait for scientists to analyze global measurements of radiocarbon in the air to see whether shes right. Thats important to find out, because Gravens model suggests that the bomb spike is falling faster than the oceans and land alone can account for. When the ocean and land draw down bomb radiocarbon, they also release some of it back into the air. That two-way movement of bomb radiocarbon ought to cause its concentration in the atmosphere to level off a little above the preCastle Bravo mark. Instead, Gravens model suggests, it continues to fall. She suspects that the missing factor is us.

We mine coal, drill for oil and gas, and then burn all that fossil fuel to power our cars, cool our houses, power our factories. In 1954, the year that John Clark set off Castle Bravo, humans emitted 6 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the air. In 2018, humans emitted about 37 billion tons. As Willard Libby first discovered, this fossil fuel has no radiocarbon left. By burning it, we are lowering the level of radiocarbon in the atmosphere, like a bartender watering down the top-shelf liquor.

If we keep burning fossil fuels at our accelerating rate, the planet will veer into climate chaos. And once more, radiocarbon will serve as a witness to our self-destructive actions. Unless we swiftly stop burning fossil fuels, we will push carbon 14 down far below the level it was at before the nuclear bombs began exploding.

To Graven, the coming radiocarbon crash is just as significant as the bomb spike has been. We're transitioning from a bomb signal to a fossil-fuel-dilution signal, she said.

The author Jonathan Weiner once observed that we should think of burning fossil fuels as a disturbance on par with nuclear-weapon detonations. It is a slow-motion explosion manufactured by every last man, woman and child on the planet, he wrote. If we threw up our billions of tons of carbon into the air all at once, it would dwarf Castle Bravo. A pillar of fire would seem to extend higher into the sky and farther into the future than the eye can see, Weiner wrote.

Bomb radiocarbon showed us how nuclear weapons threatened the entire world. Today, everyone on Earth still carries that mark. Now our pulse of carbon 14 is turning into an inverted bomb spike, a new signal of the next great threat to human survival.

Read more:
Nuclear Tests Marked Life on Earth With a Radioactive Spike - The Atlantic

The Best Diets of 2020 – The Top Weight Loss Diets Per a Dietician – GoodHousekeeping.com

Posted: March 3, 2020 at 6:45 am

With the new year far behind and thoughts of a trip to the beach on spring break soon approaching, you may have already tried your hand at changing your diet this year and maybe even failed spectacularly at it. The truth is, many of the popular diets currently being discussed on television shows and social media are truly restrictive: Keto dieters and those who attempted Whole30 can definitely tell you how hard it is to completely eradicate food groups from your daily routine. But losing weight isn't always about cutting things out; in fact, it might be about adding more foods into your line up, says Stefani Sassos, MS, RD, CDN, a registered dietitian in the Good Housekeeping Institute.

The best diets may not be as trendy as the worst diets on this list, but Sassos says they set you up for maintaining healthy weight loss over a longer period of time (possibly, for good!). Her top pick is more about adapting your lifestyle rather than following a regimen for a few months, but it could lead to even more weight loss than you'd experience on another program. Regardless of which diet you choose to try this year, you'll need to practice the following advice in order to truly reap all the benefits that sustained weight loss can offer:

Sassos' top pick is one we've been hearing more about in the last few years: the Mediterranean diet. You won't be counting calories or stressing over a slip up on this diet because it's based on the atmosphere of life in nations like Greece, Spain, Italy, and the south of France. Instead, you'll be eating as many vegetables, fruits, pulses and legumes (including everything from beans to lentils), and many sources of whole grains (farro is your friend!). While you'll enjoy lean proteins such as salmon nearly every day, you can indulge in better-for-you sources of saturated fats (cheese and some cured meats included).

"It's an approach to cooking that emphasizes vegetables, naturally leading to a ton of antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals in your diet," Sassos says, adding that the diet has been linked to weight loss and a reduction in disease risk, plus a boost in longevity overall. Many curious health experts first began exploring the benefits of the Mediterranean diet in the early 2010s, shortly after a team at the University of Barcelona demonstrated how effectively the diet transformed cardiovascular health for at-risk individuals. There are many pieces of evidence that point to the diet's effectiveness in preventing disease, but most recently, newly published results of a study in the journal Gut demonstrate how the Mediterranean diet may also vastly improve our digestive health.

"At its core, the diet is all about getting back to the basics and really enjoying whole foods," Sassos says. "Its role in fighting inflammation across the body and brain is just an added bonus."

"It's old school, and the saying is true: If it ain't broke, don't fix it," Sassos says of the Volumetrics diet, another favorite of health experts in years past. Developed by health experts at Pennsylvania State University, this diet stresses thinking of new, fun ways to eat more fruits and vegetables, and upping how much water you consume without thinking about it. Since it's based on the volume of your meals, people often feel like they're eating quite a lot, which is good for dieters who can't fight hunger pangs. "I am a type of person where I like to maximize my calories, and I don't want to feel starving," Sassos says, adding that the Volumetrics' approach also ups your fiber to maximize satiety. "Why would I have one tiny cookie when I could have this giant greek yogurt sundae? I like more, and feeling full."

Sassos says the evidence presented by Barbara Rollins, PhD, the author behind The Ultimate Volumetrics Diet, is more than solid. It'll help you eat more veggies naturally by targeting foods that keep you full and happy (without leaving you wishing you could have a piece of cheese at midnight).

Notice that we aren't using the v-word here. "I often recommend going plant-based as much as possible versus going completely vegan, because adopting a vegan lifestyle can be very difficult for people who are simply hoping to lose weight and not address other health issues," Sassos says. "You shouldn't feel guilty if you can't fully go vegan or if you've failed in trying to do so in the past. Rather, you should empower yourself to adopt your meals to be as plant-forward as possible."

Being a flexitarian isn't like following other diets with strict regimens: It's about setting a schedule that fits your own needs and lifestyle, and there's not a set meal plan you need to adhere to. Flexitarian meal plans are best when focused on targeting certain meals to be as devoid of dairy and meat as possible, but it doesn't mean you can't enjoy these items throughout the week. "You can still have things like chicken, but flexitarian diets are at least 50% plants or more," Sassos says. "At my house, we do totally plant-based (true to vegan style) meals between two and three days a week, where I substitute dairy and meat for plant-based alternatives or omit altogether."

An important caveat, though: Being vegan or flexitarian doesn't mean you have carte blanche to eat "fake" vegan alternatives (like Impossible Burgers) all the time. "Vegan meals and snacks can also be unhealthy, too: Things like Oreos and chips may be considered vegan, but that doesn't mean they're healthy."

Danielle Occhiogrosso Daly

Just as the Mediterranean diet has enjoyed the spotlight as one of the healthiest diets in the last few years, the keto diet is equally publicized for promising results on a controversial meal plan. For most health professionals, understanding a diet's effectiveness boils down to why it was created in the first place. And the ketogenic diet was largely designed, interestingly enough, as a form of treatment for pediatric epilepsy in the 20th century, Sassos says. For those of you who don't know, manipulating your body into ketosis requires you to vastly restrict almost all sources of lean protein and almost all carbohydrates (fruits, veggies, and legumes included). But Sassos believes cutting out nutrient-dense veggies and other complex carbohydrates could do damage to much more than just your waistline. "The first thing that your brain needs to function are carbs. When you cut out carbs completely, you could be affecting regions of your body that you're not even aware of," Sassos says. "You need carbs; cooking the right kinds of healthy carbohydrates and watching your portion sizes are much more valuable tips that any kind of exclusion from your diet."

There's some science behind why you may lose weight during the first few weeks (mostly, water weight) and Sassos says that she appreciates the awareness that keto programs have brought to added sugar. "It does keep you away from candy and really sugary treats, but the fact of the matter is that you do need to eat natural sources of sugar," she argues. "Apples, Ezekiel bread, grains like farro and quinoa, beans; all of these things will contain natural sugars and complex carbs, and they're part of a wholesome, balanced diet."

Staving off all sources of carbohydrates in the long term isn't sustainable for most. Sassos says a failed attempt at the keto diet could end up in even more weight afterwards, or long-lasting damaging side effects from the increased dependency on fat. "If you're a normal healthy person and you're suddenly eating bacon, butter, and all of this red meat, it will affect your heart and overall cardiovascular system in not so great ways." Weight cycling, or the aspect of continuously dieting just to gain weight back later, has been shown to be severely damaging on our psyche and may even impact longevity, especially in young adults and teens and critics of the keto diet highlight this, as getting off the diet can often lead to rapid weight gain shortly thereafter.

There are too many harmful trendy diets to count, but sometimes the allure of a fad diet (often adopted by celebrities in a dramatic fashion) has to do with results. Sassos highlights the following three diets as being bad choices for long-term, sustained weight loss, but she also agrees that there are some lessons hiding beneath all of the glossy photos of their successes.

The bottom line: Nearly all of the diets that health experts love encourage a variety of food groups and moderation, whereas diets that restrict what you eat or when you eat it could inhibit to keep weight off in the long run. Anything that seems questionable probably is, Sassos says case in point, the Dr. Sebi Diet, which is currently making rounds on the internet for fast weight loss. Try to look for any scientific credentials within the book or website in question, and see if the diet's name has been attached to any scientific research published in journals. If you've never heard of it, it's probably for good reason.

Follow this link:
The Best Diets of 2020 - The Top Weight Loss Diets Per a Dietician - GoodHousekeeping.com


Page 948«..1020..947948949950..960970..»