Scarsdale diet

TheScarsdale dietis a very stricteatingplan that allows for just 1,000 calories per day, regardless of your body size, gender, or activity level. No substitutions of any kind are allowed and each meal is specifically defined for each of the 14-days of thediet. On the plan, you eat three meals per day.

The Scarsdale diet is a high-protein, low-calorie, and low carbohydrate weight loss program developed by Herman Tarnower, a cardiologist from New York state. The programme gained widespread media attention in the 1970s as the go-to quick weight loss programme for society women and fashion elites. It gained additional notoriety after Tarnower was murdered just a year after his best-selling book was published.

The diet is no longer as popular as it once was, as health experts have been critical of the very low-calorie requirements and the inflated weight loss claims.

The banana and milk diet involves eating only bananas and drinking milk for 4 days. The programme was developed in 1934 by Dr. George Harrop. The main logic behind the diet was to consume fewer calories than usual, but still stay healthy. Both the milk and bananas have many health benefits which help with staying fit during the diet. Followers of the diet consume less than 1000 calories per day, making them lose weight easily.

Although bananas and milk do have health benefits, following such a restrictive diet isnt typically a good idea. While you may lose weight, its unlikely that youll sustain it once you return to normal eating habits.

Whether the famous combination of milk and banana is good or bad for health has always been in debate.

Thegrapefruit diet is a protein-rich meal plan that focuses on consuming grapefruit or grapefruit juice at every meal. The diets goal is quick weight loss, and its a 12-day plan. While several versions of the diet exist, the majority of them include a daily caloric intake of less than 1 000 calories which means weight loss should be rapid.

The grape diet proposed by famous South African seer, Johanna Brandt, recommended fasting for two or three days, consuming only cold water, followed by a diet of only grapes and water for one to two weeks, with seven meals a day. Fresh fruits, tomatoes, and sour milk or cottage cheese are then introduced into the diet followed by raw vegetables.

Brandt, a spy during the Boer War, prophet and writer on controversial health subjects, popularized the grape diet as a treatment for cancer from 1925. She published about twenty pamphlets on the subject of natural remedies for health problems with her best-known publication being The Grape Cure. This publication is said to have been written after Brandt had cured herself of stomach cancer by following the diet.The book was republished in 1989 asHow to Conquer Cancer, Naturally, including an endorsement of Brandts work by Benedict Lust who is commonly referred to as the father of naturopathy. The book may have been inspired by Arnold Ehret, a contemporary, who taught a Grape Cure course.

It is believed the grape detox diet can help relieve ailments and reduce weight by cleansing the body and flushing out toxic waste. The grape detox is an eating plan typically used by those who wish to lose weight, become healthier and sometimes as an attempt to eliminate serious illness such as cancer and lung disease.

Image by Shutterbug75 from Pixabay

The Atkins diet, the most famous low-carb weight loss diet in the world, was created by cardiologist Robert Atkins in the early 1970s. It claims to produce rapid weight loss without hunger.

The Atkins diet is a high-protein, high-fat diet that restricts carbs and gradually adds them back in, based on personal tolerance. Studies have shown it is one of the most effective ways to lose weight.

Discuss any diet you plan on embarking on with your doctor.

Read more here:
The ups and downs of 5 fad diets of the past - Soweto Urban

Several lucky fans recently had the chance to chat with SHINee's Taemin via SM Entertainment's 'Lysn' app, were the idol shared a ton of spoilers about his comeback preparations!

Comfortably chatting with fans while using adorable emojis, Taemin said, "Iwas practicing choreography hehe. For a new song!Should I give you a spoiler?"

He also added, "I'll be releasing a lot of albums this time. This will be the most number of album releases I've ever had in a year. And my music style has changed keke.You might not be able to see me performing in the style that I've been performing until now TT."

Regarding the changes to his music and choreography style,Taemin joking added, "I've been thinking a lot lately, and I think that my performances are not fresh because there's too much dancing going on keke. So I'll be cutting ties with dancing. You'll love me even if I'm not dancing, right? But I already said that I was practicing new choreography..."

While preparing for his solo comeback, Taemin also revealed that he's been dieting, for approximately a month now! "Because of too much cheek fat, it's hard to see my lovely cheekbones, so I'm on a diet. When artists are preparing for comebacks, they all typically go into a period of taking stricter care and dieting," the idol explained.

As you can see below, Taemin took a lot of time to answer tons of fans' questions, chatting about idle topics like his drinking habits, and also hinting that he's broken into(?) fellow member Key's house before! Are you looking forward to Taemin's transformation for his next solo comeback?

Follow this link:
Taemin reveals he's working on multiple solo comeback albums + that his music and choreography style will change - allkpop

He says he told his daughter they were "working to set her up for the future being physically fit and mindful of what she eats".

But things came to a head when his daughter went to a birthday party and had to take snacks to share.

"I'm trying to show my kid that snacks can be healthy, so I sent her with a bag of veggie sticks and hummus. She made a little fuss about not getting candy but seemed fine."

At the sleepover the little girl refused to eat any pizza food, and began crying that "she was going to get fat".

"[She] told the other kids that they were gonna get fat and unhealthy because their parents gave them those snacks. She said she had to eat the veggies so she could lose weight, and she wasn't allowed any popcorn."

The man wrote that his ex-wife "blames me for giving [our daughter] a complex when she was healthy and active".

"I said if she was healthy she wouldn't have a belly and be bigger than other girls. I said that at least I cared about what the girl puts in her mouth Now ex is telling me she won't send her back to me if I don't stop 'emotionally damaging' her. "

The post has racked up more than 2000 comments, mostly from people slamming the man's forceful parenting.

"Man, your daughter is NINE. She is a little chubby, for what you have said, and she was CRYING because she was scared if she ate anything. For christ's sake, [you're the asshole] and you are f**king your daughter's life up. What the actual hell you think you are doing?" one person wrote.

"I appreciate that you are looking out for your daughter, but this is completely the wrong way to go about it. She is scared to eat pizza or popcorn? Really?? Yeah, she may have a little baby fat on her but she's nine and hasn't hit puberty yet," wrote another.

One woman pointed out that dieting is an "uphill battle" for women.

"This is the world we - girls and women - live in. We are constantly inundated with messages and images that we are not enough, worthless. It leads to mental health issues, eating disorders, abusive relationships, self-harm, substance abuse, and death.

"You haven't done the bare minimum to support your daughter in a society that is mentally and physically dangerous for girls and women. YOU are the health threat. Not her stomach fat. YOU."

A 2018 study published in children's health journal Pediatrics found that weight shaming, or stress on dieting over healthy eating, can lead to a cycle of disordered eating and poor self-esteem in children.

Read the original here:
Father slammed after 'emotionally damaging' 9yo daughter with strict diet - Newshub

People living with an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) such as Crohns disease or ulcerative colitis have a less-diverse microbial community in their gut, and this can contribute to intestinal inflammation. Researchers at the University of Massachusetts Medical School have developed the IBD-Anti Inflammatory Diet (IBD-AID)to help these individuals restore the good bacteria in their guts and reduce IBD symptoms.

The diet, which scientists worked on for 15 years, is made up of three phases to treat flares and maintain remission. In the first phase of the diet, a person increases his or her intake of prebiotic and probiotic foods, while avoiding certain carbohydrates.

Probiotics are fermented foods that have live bacteria in them, such as:

Prebiotics, which support the growth of probiotics in the digestive system, include:

Second, the diet also involves avoiding trans fats, processed foods, fast food, and pro-inflammatory carbohydrates, which includes anything with lactose, wheat, refined sugar, and corn. This, the researchers say, will starve the bad bacteria and help a sensitive gut recover.

And finally, patients were encouraged to eat a variety of fruits and vegetables, lean protein, and healthy fats.

How successful is the diet?

In a small study abstract presented at the Crohns and Colitis Congress January 2325, 2020, in Austin, Texas, Ana Luisa Maldonado-Contreras, PhD, an assistant professor of microbiology at University of Massachusetts (UMass) Medical School and her colleagues found that participants with moderate to severe IBD who were on the IBD-AID diet for eight weeks saw a 61.3 percent decrease in disease severity.

Dr. Maldonado-Contreras says the diet isnt an exclusion but a substitution diet, because its all about sustainability.

The first task was to recognize that this is challenging because its a complete mindset change, but when people consider nutrition as part of their medicine, they can begin to solve their IBD issues, she says. Were advocating for prebiotic foods like bananas, chia seeds, oats, garlic, and onion because we want people to introduce more normal or real foods instead of inulin supplements, she says. Inulin supplements are the common prebiotics found in containers sold at vitamin shops.

Study participants had different stages of disease severity and were on different treatments, so they served as their own control in this study. Using in weekly food-intake surveys and twice-weekly stool samples over the course of 18 weeks, Maldonado-Contreras was able to match up the patients microbiomes with what they ate and assess their symptoms.

Stool samples also showed that the diet resulted in an increase in the abundance of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). SCFAs are created by fermentation when microbes break down food that humans can't digest, and they promote the growth of other bacteria that help make nutrients available to the body.

The IBD-AID diet does not diverge too much from the specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) when it comes to cutting out carbohydrates. The main difference is that, while the IBD-AID emphasizes pre- and probiotics, the SCD focuses more on prohibiting certain carbohydrates that may either throw off the balance of the gut bacteria or promote inflammation in the gut. Both effects are especially bad for those with IBD.

I love the focus on pre- and probiotic foods as well as the phased approach that the IBD-AID diet sets forth, says Kelly Kennedy, RD, who manages and oversees nutrition content, meal planning, and diet and nutrition coaching at Everyday Health. Pre- and probiotics are proving to be immensely important to overall human health and especially gut health.

Another common diet for people with IBD is the low-FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols) diet, which encourages low intake of certain carbs that trigger inflammation in the digestive system. It involves strict restriction of any foods high in FODMAPS for three to eight weeks.

While that approach has been shown to be relatively effective for many people, the diet itself is restrictive at first and can be difficult to follow as a result, says Kennedy.

Also, the foods that are allowed or restricted on the low-FODMAP diet are not obvious because they are based on the types of fermentable carbohydrates in each food, so you'd need to keep a list of allowed foods handy especially as you're getting started on that diet, she explains.

The next short-term step for Maldonado-Contreras and her team will be to repeat the study with a larger number of patients so they can work with a larger data set and refine the diet as necessary. In the meantime, people with IBD can try some fun menu ideas, including a pumpkin spice smoothie and a tofu stir-fry with zesty almond sauce(the UMass Medical School is also developing videos to teach people on the IBD-AID diet how to prepare meals).

Were not telling people whats right to do but instead giving them the tools, she says, its complicated and hard, but lets work together and get results.

Go here to read the rest:
Could a New Diet Focused on Restoring the Gut Microbiome Reduce IBD Symptoms? - Everyday Health

In recent years, its become increasingly apparent that what we eat is a major source of emissions. But as an environmentally-conscious consumer, its not always clear whats the best course of action to reduce emissions.

A new analysis concludes that eating less carbon-intensive foods is the best thing to do. Eating less meat and dairy is more important than eating locally-sourced foods.

Food availability has improved dramatically over the years. We have access to unprecedented richness and diversity, having the luxury of enjoying fruits and vegetables from all corners of the world.

We get our avocados from Mexic, our kiwi from China, our tomatoes from Spain, and our bananas from Brazil. These are just a few examples, but theyre telling of how international our food sources have become. Of course, these foods have to be transported from far away, which produces emissions. So if youre considering reducing your diets emissions, eating local seems like a natural place to start.

The eat local movement has gained a lot of traction in recent times, and it makes a lot of sense. Not only are you cutting down on emissions, but youre supporting local farmers and eating local products.

But if were strictly talking about emission, eating locally rarely produces substantial benefits. If you really want to make a difference, its more about what you eat than where it comes from.

Specifically, and as researchers have emphasized time and time again, red meat is the biggest culprit when it comes to emissions.

Plant-based foods produce 10-50 times lower emissions than most animal products, even if they come from far away. Its not just transportation but all the processes in the supply chain, from processing to transport and packaging, typically account for a small share of emissions.

Instead, the biggest part of farm-associated emissions come from, well, farming. Eating local beef or lamb is much worse than eating exotic fruits or vegetables which come from the other side of the world.

Lets take an avocado as an example. If a kilogram of avocado is shipped from Mexico to Western Europe, it would produce generate 0.27kg CO2 in transport emissions. This is only around 10% of the total emissions associated with that kilogram of avocado.

But farming a kilogram of beef, even without any transportation, generates somewhere between 20 and 60 kg of CO2 much, much more.

These meat emissions are also pretty much inescapable. No matter how much you try to improve the process, the reason why meat produces emissions has to do with biology.

As a ballpark figure, plants transform about 10% of the solar energy they receive into useful energy. Herbivores transform about 10% of the energy they get from eating plants into useful energy. So no matter how you look at it, most of the food that herbivores eat is not transformed into calories that we can then consume most is wasted. So instead of using fields to grow food for ourselves, we use fields to grow food to feed animals, but we get 10 times fewer calories (there is a mention to be made about some lands which are not usable for crops and are usable as pastures, but this is not a major component).

This means that farming meat needs a lot of land area, a lot of water, and a lot of energy. All of this is translated into emissions (along with other environmental problems)

Dairy, seafood, and cheese are also very carbon-intensive. Some plant-based products such as chocolate and coffee also have a major impact. In chocolate, this largely happens because of the land-use change, whereas in coffee, it is because of the farming process itself. Still, one kilogram of coffee or chocolate is not consumed as fast as one kilogram of meat or cheese (I know, you love chocolate but you dont love it that much).

The reason why transportation accounts for so little of products that come from far away is that weve become very efficient at it and its mostly done by ships, which produce far fewer emissions per mile than planes, for instance.

But when food it air-freighted, it can have a major impact.

Its difficult to know which products have been air-freighted because theyre rarely labeled as such, but the good news is that air transportation accounts for only 0.16% of food miles.

Its usually quickly-perishable foods that are air-freighted, such as berries or asparagus. Its good to keep an eye out for these (and a labeling policy would help), but again, these make up a very, very small portion of total foods.

To sum it up, if you want to cut down on your own emissions, paying more attention to what you eat is a good place to start you can make a significant difference with this. Even switching from beef to chicken, or having 1-2 meat-free days per week can make a major impact.

The first thing to do is try to reduce meat and dairy consumption. Eating local might be good for supporting local businesses, but when it comes to emissions, it doesnt make a big difference. The one big exception is products transported via air. Its not always possible to know which products are air-freighted, but they make up for a small minority of what we see on the shelves.

Its becoming increasingly difficult to be aware of our foods environmental impact, and things can vary significantly from place to place, but eating less meat and dairy is a good place to start no matter where you are.

Excerpt from:
Want to reduce your diets carbon footprint? Focus on what you eat, not on buying local - ZME Science

BY KEITH ROACH, M.D.

DEAR DR. ROACH: Does eating strictly organic food and drinking only bottled water help in a meaningful way to prevent diseases and contribute to a long and healthy life? M.T.

ANSWER: There is no consistent high-quality evidence that consuming organic foods lead to improvement in health outcomes, including longer life. Some but not all studies have found slightly higher amounts of nutrients in organically grown produce. Organic foods are made without synthetic pesticides, but may use pesticides found in nature. There is not convincing evidence that natural pesticides are any safer, nor that the small amount of residual pesticides left in conventional produce leads to significant health risks. However, there is preliminary evidence that consumption of mostly organic food led to a decrease in the risk of one type of cancer, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, but not an overall decrease in cancer. Based on current available evidence, I dont recommend organic food consumption for health benefits.

The quality of tap water varies greatly across North America, but most locations have high-quality water available at extremely low cost with minimal environmental impact compared with bottled water. Even if tap water is unpalatable in a persons location, I recommend a filter system rather than resorting to bottled water, again for environmental concerns as well as cost. Bottled water is rarely the only option, and if so it is usually due to contamination of tap water with microbes or heavy metals, which should be known to the community. My own municipality mails me a water quality report yearly, and it is outstanding quality.

Two additional points are worth considering. The first is that organically prepared foods have been the cause of foodborne illness due to contamination at a much higher level than expected. The second is that organic farming prohibits nontherapeutic antibiotics, a practice with which I strongly agree as a means of reducing the potential for antibiotic resistance.

Until further evidence is available, my opinion is that most people would do better eating more produce, whether conventionally or organically grown. Locally grown fresh produce may have more benefits than organically produced due to freshness.

DEAR DR. ROACH: All of the latest information states that an adult needs seven to nine hours of sleep a night. Is this unbroken sleep? For example, I sleep for four hours, wake up for one to two hours, and then sleep three to four more hours almost every night. If the sleep is to be continuous, is it better to take a sleeping aid or continue with the current pattern? Nothing I read indicates if sleeping seven to nine hours with a sleeping aid provides the same benefit as not sleeping continuously for that time period. P.M.

ANSWER: While it is true that people who sleep seven to nine hours per night tend to live longer than those who sleep less (or more), it is likely that there are some people who need more or less sleep than the average. Further, it isnt clear whether the apparent improvement in longevity is due to better sleeping, or whether people who dont sleep well have an underlying medical condition that is really responsible for the harm seen.

As far as whether continuous sleep is better than interrupted sleep, there isnt good evidence to compare the two. There is strong historical evidence that prior to artificial lighting, two distinct sleep periods separated by an hour or so was considered normal.

Most sleeping aids adversely affect sleep quality, and increase risk of falls and accidents the next day. If interrupted sleep is working for you, Id recommend continuing versus using a sleeping pill.

Dear Annie: I am a 64-year-old woman. Trying to date seems more difficult as I get older. Seems like most men only ...

By ROBERT KEPLERIn the Our View column of The Express on Feb. 5 it stated that our area deserves its fair ...

For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. (1 Corinthians 14:33 ...

By SHAUN M. DOUGHERTYPresident Donald Trump has proposed one of the largest increases in funding for career and ...

Dear Annie: Ive had my current job for four years. I work at a small company of about 20 employees. My ...

AL SEVERMontoursvilleA recent letter to the editor stated that prices for flying out of the Williamsport ...

Read the original here:
To Your Good Health: Risks and rewards of a strictly organic diet | News, Sports, Jobs - Lock Haven Express

DEAR DR. ROACH: Does eating strictly organic food and drinking only bottled water help in a meaningful way to prevent diseases and contribute to a long and healthy life? -- M.T.

ANSWER: There is no consistent high-quality evidence that consuming organic foods lead to improvement in health outcomes, including longer life. Some but not all studies have found slightly higher amounts of nutrients in organically grown produce. Organic foods are made without synthetic pesticides, but may use pesticides found in nature. There is not convincing evidence that natural pesticides are any safer, nor that the small amount of residual pesticides left in conventional produce leads to significant health risks. However, there is preliminary evidence that consumption of mostly organic food led to a decrease in the risk of one type of cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, but not an overall decrease in cancer. Based on current available evidence, I don't recommend organic food consumption for health benefits.

The quality of tap water varies greatly across North America, but most locations have high-quality water available at extremely low cost with minimal environmental impact compared with bottled water. Even if tap water is unpalatable in a person's location, I recommend a filter system rather than resorting to bottled water, again for environmental concerns as well as cost. Bottled water is rarely the only option, and if so it is usually due to contamination of tap water with microbes or heavy metals, which should be known to the community. My own municipality mails me a water quality report yearly, and it is outstanding quality.

Two additional points are worth considering. The first is that organically prepared foods have been the cause of foodborne illness due to contamination at a much higher level than expected. The second is that organic farming prohibits nontherapeutic antibiotics, a practice with which I strongly agree as a means of reducing the potential for antibiotic resistance.

Until further evidence is available, my opinion is that most people would do better eating more produce, whether conventionally or organically grown. Locally grown fresh produce may have more benefits than organically produced due to freshness.

DEAR DR. ROACH: All of the latest information states that an adult needs seven to nine hours of sleep a night. Is this "unbroken" sleep? For example, I sleep for four hours, wake up for one to two hours, and then sleep three to four more hours almost every night. If the sleep is to be continuous, is it better to take a sleeping aid or continue with the current pattern? Nothing I read indicates if sleeping seven to nine hours with a sleeping aid provides the same benefit as not sleeping continuously for that time period. -- P.M.

ANSWER: While it is true that people who sleep seven to nine hours per night tend to live longer than those who sleep less (or more), it is likely that there are some people who need more or less sleep than the average. Further, it isn't clear whether the apparent improvement in longevity is due to better sleeping, or whether people who don't sleep well have an underlying medical condition that is really responsible for the harm seen.

As far as whether continuous sleep is better than interrupted sleep, there isn't good evidence to compare the two. There is strong historical evidence that prior to artificial lighting, two distinct sleep periods separated by an hour or so was considered normal.

Most sleeping aids adversely affect sleep quality, and increase risk of falls and accidents the next day. If interrupted sleep is working for you, I'd recommend continuing versus using a sleeping pill.

Dr. Roach regrets that he is unable to answer individual letters, but will incorporate them in the column whenever possible. Readers may email questions to ToYourGoodHealth@med.cornell.edu or send mail to 628 Virginia Dr., Orlando, FL 32803.

More here:
HEALTH: Risks and rewards of a strictly organic diet - Rockdale Newton Citizen

DEAR DR. ROACH: Does eating strictly organic food and drinking only bottled water help in a meaningful way to prevent diseases and contribute to a long and healthy life? M.T.

ANSWER: There is no consistent high-quality evidence that consuming organic foods lead to improvement in health outcomes, including longer life. Some but not all studies have found slightly higher amounts of nutrients in organically grown produce. Organic foods are made without synthetic pesticides, but may use pesticides found in nature. There is not convincing evidence that natural pesticides are any safer, nor that the small amount of residual pesticides left in conventional produce leads to significant health risks. However, there is preliminary evidence that consumption of mostly organic food led to a decrease in the risk of one type of cancer, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, but not an overall decrease in cancer. Based on current available evidence, I dont recommend organic food consumption for health benefits.

The quality of tap water varies greatly across North America, but most locations have high-quality water available at extremely low cost with minimal environmental impact compared with bottled water. Even if tap water is unpalatable in a persons location, I recommend a filter system rather than resorting to bottled water, again for environmental concerns as well as cost. Bottled water is rarely the only option, and if so it is usually due to contamination of tap water with microbes or heavy metals, which should be known to the community. My own municipality mails me a water quality report yearly, and it is outstanding quality.

Two additional points are worth considering. The first is that organically prepared foods have been the cause of foodborne illness due to contamination at a much higher level than expected. The second is that organic farming prohibits nontherapeutic antibiotics, a practice with which I strongly agree as a means of reducing the potential for antibiotic resistance.

Until further evidence is available, my opinion is that most people would do better eating more produce, whether conventionally or organically grown. Locally grown fresh produce may have more benefits than organically produced due to freshness.

DEAR DR. ROACH: All of the latest information states that an adult needs seven to nine hours of sleep a night. Is this unbroken sleep? For example, I sleep for four hours, wake up for one to two hours, and then sleep three to four more hours almost every night. If the sleep is to be continuous, is it better to take a sleeping aid or continue with the current pattern? Nothing I read indicates if sleeping seven to nine hours with a sleeping aid provides the same benefit as not sleeping continuously for that time period. P.M.

ANSWER: While it is true that people who sleep seven to nine hours per night tend to live longer than those who sleep less (or more), it is likely that there are some people who need more or less sleep than the average. Further, it isnt clear whether the apparent improvement in longevity is due to better sleeping, or whether people who dont sleep well have an underlying medical condition that is really responsible for the harm seen.

As far as whether continuous sleep is better than interrupted sleep, there isnt good evidence to compare the two. There is strong historical evidence that prior to artificial lighting, two distinct sleep periods separated by an hour or so was considered normal.

Most sleeping aids adversely affect sleep quality, and increase risk of falls and accidents the next day. If interrupted sleep is working for you, Id recommend continuing versus using a sleeping pill.

Continued here:
Risks and rewards of a strictly organic diet - Clinton Herald

In the summer of 2018, Olympic legend Mark Spitz walked to his fridge and almost fainted. His wife called the paramedics, kicking off a harrowing 12 hours at his local hospital.

The incident came out of nowhere. No one was as surprised as Spitz, who, at 70 years old, is still in damn good shape, exercises regularly, and has eaten a low-meat diet for almost 20 years. So what happened?

It turns out Spitz has atrial fibrillation, more commonly known as AFib. Its a condition where the heart beats erraticallyeither too fast (tachycardia), as it does for Spitz, or too slow (bradycardia). Curiously, its relatively common among elite athletes as they age. And in case you need a refresher about Spitzs elite athlete status: In 1972, he won seven gold medals and set seven world records at the Munich Olympics, all while rocking one of the finest mustaches of the 20th century.

Spitz has made a full recovery since his scare in the summer of 2018so much so that hes enthusiastically partnered with AliveCor, which manufactures the portable EKG monitor he now endorses (KardiaMobile). He recently spoke to GQ about living with a chronic heart condition, swimming imaginary races against Michael Phelps in his backyard pool, how training for the Olympics has evolved in the half-century since he competed, and who to watch for in Tokyo this year.

GQ: Can you tell me how you came to be diagnosed with AFib?

Mark Spitz: Well, it was a Sunday I believe, and my wife asked me to grab some blueberries from the refrigerator. When I got out there, I was feeling kind of weird, like light-headed, and I said to my wife, I think Im going to faint. And I dont ever get that sensation. After about five minutes, my wife called the paramedics.

The next 12 hours, they were trying to control me with medication. They had an IV in one arm for blood thinners, and another IV for controlling adrenaline to get my heart rate down. It was coming down but not fast enough, and they thought they could actually shock me into sinus rhythm. I was put to sleep and they shocked me three times in two minutes, like you see in the movies with the paddles. It still didnt go down until later that evening.

Id imagine that was a scary time.

Oh yeah. The disturbing thing I found out is that this stuff doesnt go away. Its not like, Take two Aspirin and call me tomorrow. This is a lifetime experience.

What kinds of lifestyle changes did you make to deal with that?

Having AFib is not a question of changing your lifestyle, its a question of understanding your lifestyle. If in fact you have some bad habits, you have to arrest those. There are three major things that my doctor says you should take into account: monitoring, diet, and exercise.

I have to be able to track my heart activity. A lot of people dont know that theyre in AFib, and a lot of people dont like to go to the doctorwhen you have an EKG, they hook up all these wires to you, and youre afraid of what theyre going to find out. But if you go into a routine of taking your EKG, then it just becomes a standard thing. I think knowing is so much more important than being afraid and not knowing.

I use this device called KardiaMobile. [Spitz is a spokesperson for KardiaMobile.] It can actually create an EKG at any time in 30 seconds. So Im constantly monitoring myself.

Go here to read the rest:
Mark Spitz: The Real-Life Diet of the Legendary Swimmer Who Still Does Imaginary Races Against Michael Phelps - GQ

Morning rituals differ greatly from person to person. While some rise early and prepare a breakfasts, others dash out the door with a coffee. But, another study is bolstering the theory that what you eat in the morning can help with weight loss.

A study from The Endocrine Society has found, in a new study, that people who eat a big breakfast might burn twice as many calories.

The new research, published in the Endocrine Society's Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, found a large breakfast is better than a large dinner for increasing the metabolism.

Juliane Richter, M.Sc., Ph.D., of University of Lbeck in Germany, said: Our results show that a meal eaten for breakfast, regardless of the amount of calories it contains, creates twice as high diet-induced thermogenesis as the same meal consumed for dinner.

This is means that body is burning through twice the calories.

READ MORE: Adele weight loss: Singer slammed for irresponsible diet after losing 7 stone

The study took place over three days.

Sixteen men took part, and consumed a low-calorie breakfast and high-calorie dinner.

There was then a second round, in which this was reversed.

The study found that even though identical calories were consumed in both stages of the experiment, calorie burning was 2.5 time higher when a large breakfast was consumed.

DONT MISSJames Martin shed four stone in two months [DIET PLAN]Five best moves for full body workout according to personal trainer [EXERCISE PLAN]Best exercises to help shed fat revealed - which burns the most calories? [TIPS]

Diet news: Weight loss shock - study reveals how to burn twice the calories

Subjects tested better for blood sugar and insulin when eating a larger breakfast.

The study also found eating a low-calorie breakfast increased appetite, specifically for sweets.

The scientist added: "We recommend that patients with obesity as well as healthy people eat a large breakfast rather than a large dinner to reduce body weight and prevent metabolic diseases.

The study did not suggest what foods should be eaten for breakfast, but that bigger is better.

The keto diet is one of the more popular weight loss diets on the market currently.

What are some of the best keto diet breakfasts to eat to shed weight?

Eggs, bacon, butter, avocado and coffee are all on the menu for breakfast.

Keto diet followers may also indulge in Greek yoghurt. Sausages and cheese also make the list.

Adding protein to your weight loss diet plan is also shown to help burn more belly fat.

Tucking into foods high in protein could give the best results, Elliott Upton, personal trainer at Ultimate Performance and Head of LiveUP Online Coaching, said.

He told Express.co.uk: Every meal should be built around a quality source of protein.

It helps to repair, rebuild and maintain muscle tissue, which not only improves body composition - the way your body looks - but also increases metabolic rate.

Elliot added: It is also satiating, so helps keep you fuller for longer, and the better you can control hunger, the more sustainable your diet will be.

Read the original:
Diet bombshell: People who do this in the morning burn twice as many calories - shock - Express