The Seattle City Council on Monday approved a new tax on  distributors of soda pop and other sugary drinks. Diet soft  drinks were exempted. The tax is expected to take effect in early  July and add about $1.18 to the cost of a 2-liter bottle of soda.
    The Seattle City Council on Monday approved a new tax on    distributors of sugary drinks such as soda pop.  
    Proponents said the tax would    reduce consumption of unhealthful beverages and help the city    provide better access to nutritious foods in low-income    neighborhoods and communities of color.  
    They said soda companies market heavily to children in those    communities, where more people struggle with sugar-linked    health problems such as obesity.  
    The vote was 7-1, with Councilmember Lisa Herbold voting no,    and Councilmember Kshama Sawant absent.  
    A handful of other cities and counties have adopted similar    taxes, including Berkeley, California; Philadelphia;    and Cook County, Illinois, which includes Chicago.  
    Its a huge win for Seattle, said Victor Colman, director of    the Seattle-based Childhood Obesity Prevention Coalition.  
    Its not a panacea for the problem of childhood obesity, but    its a huge marker to take this step. Consumption drops will    happen, and were going to see stronger health in the    communities that need this the most.  
    Mondays action followed months of debate over the tax, initially proposed by Mayor Ed Murray.    Business groups and some labor unions warned that the plan    would burden entrepreneurs and result in job losses.  
    There were arguments about whether diet soda would be taxed,    whether the syrups in flavored lattes    prepared by baristas would be taxed, what the tax rate    would be and how the money would be spent.  
    The council ultimately settled on a rate of 1.75cents per    ounce, which means the tax would be about $1.18 for a 2-liter    bottle of soda.  
    The tax will be collected starting next year unless opponents    put a referendum on the ballot and succeed in blocking the    measure.  
    Diet soda wont be taxed, and the council also chose to exempt    baby formula, medicine, weight-loss drinks and 100 percent    fruit juice.  
    Sports drinks such as Gatorade, energy drinks such as Red Bull    and fruit drinks such as Sunny D all will be taxed, along with    syrups used in soda-fountain pop.  
    Some council members favored including diet soda, which is    more popular with wealthier white    consumers. That was one recommendation made after the city    put the plan through a racial-equity analysis.  
    But other council members said the science suggesting diet soda    is an unhealthful beverage is less solid than the evidence of regular soda being    harmful.  
    The mayor initially exempted barista-made coffee beverages from    the tax. Then he exempted milk drinks, instead. It remained    unclear Monday whether the syrups used in flavored lattes such    as those ordered at Starbucks would be taxed.  
    Amendments were proposed by Council President Bruce Harrell to    explicitly exclude such drinks and by Councilmember Lisa    Herbold to explicitly include them, but each failed. Herbold    said its her understanding that lattes wont end up being    taxed.  
    Herbold said she voted against the tax because her colleagues    rejected her attempts to lower the rate and to include diet    soda and lattes. She said the tax measure, as passed, would hit    poor pop buyers hardest.  
    There were mixed messages about the reason for the tax, with    some proponents saying it would discourage consumption of    unhealthful beverages and others stressing the good that would    be done with the revenue.  
    Under the mayors plan, the bulk of the revenue would have    funded education programs for low-income and otherwise    vulnerable children. But the council shifted the emphasis more    toward healthful-eating programs.  
    The tax is expected to raise about $15million per year. Some    money will support the citys Fresh Bucks program,    which helps people using food stamps buy more fruits and    vegetables at farmers markets.  
    And the council approved an amendment offered by Councilmember    Debora Juarez calling out food banks and soup kitchens as    eligible to receive funds.  
    Funds raised by the tax will put healthy food on the table for    hungry families across our city, said Tanika Thompson, a    food-access organizer for the South Seattle community    organization Got Green.  
    Doctors and health organizations such as the American Heart    Association supported the tax.  
    But soda companies, many convenience-store and restaurant    owners and the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce opposed    it, as did the Martin Luther King County Labor Council and a    Teamsters union with workers in the soda industry.  
    The council reserved up to $1.5million in the first five years    of the tax to help such workers retrain for new jobs.  
    Husik Harutyunyan, who owns a small grocery store in North    Seattle, urged the council to reject the tax.  
    He said his customers may begin buying pop in Shoreline if the    tax leads him to raise his prices. I have to close my store    and go find some job, the 44-year-old said.  
    A 10-year-old, Sophia Harrison, offered another view during the    councils public-comment period Monday.  
    It is a great idea to fund programs to help kids be more    prepared and to help families eat more healthy food, she said,    reading from handwritten remarks.  
    I cant think of a better way to raise that money than a tax    on something that has absolutely no nutritional value.  
Read more from the original source:
Seattle will tax sugary soda  but not diet - The Seattle Times