Search Weight Loss Topics:

Page 1,577«..1020..1,5761,5771,5781,579..1,5901,600..»

Bug bites – Grand Junction Daily Sentinel

Posted: May 7, 2017 at 12:42 am

World hunger issues prompt GJ man to try monthlong diet of insects

Jeremy Connor sprinkles a measuring cup full of crickets over his rice and beans as he prepares a meal at his Grand Junction home. Connor and his wife, Naomi, are blogging about their #BugsEndHunger campaign to promote insects as a food source.

Jeremy Connor of Grand Junction is eating insects during the month of May to draw attention to bugs as a way to end malnutrition and hunger.

Breakfast: potatoes with crickets.

Dinner: black beans, rice and fresh salsa, whole roasted crickets and white corn tortillas.

Lunch: corn tortillas with refried beans, olives, crickets, lettuce and salsa.

Lunch: corn tortillas with refried beans, olives, crickets, lettuce and salsa.

By Staff Saturday, May 6, 2017

Jeremy Connor has a long history of picky eating.

Butter on his bread? No thanks. Dressing on his salad? Forget it. Avocados? Nope.

So you can imagine his breakfast Monday morning: potatoes cut homefries-style or in the style of a typical Central American meal and pan-fried until tender, tossed with a handful of crickets.

Yes, crickets. Those crickets, relatives of the stark black insects he saw clinging to the underside of a tarp in his yard when he lifted it a while back. He saw those several dozen bugs and thought, hmmm

Hed been pondering and researching for a while aquaponics, hydroponics, various methods of small-scale, sustainable agriculture that could not only supplement his familys diet, but help him contribute to combating malnutrition and hunger, worldwide problems that have long laid on his heart.

So, insects. Bugs. Creeping (or hopping) critters that some researchers think have the potential to end world hunger.

Ill be the first to admit its not easy, said Connor, 40, a Grand Junction father of four who has a background in ministry. That first time I just kind of breathed through it and once I ate it, it was like, oh, this is OK.

For the entire month of May, Connor is conducting an experiment in which his diet consists only of the insects and plant-based foods that can either be found locally in the four regions of the world with the highest concentration of people who endure chronic hunger, or brought in through food aid programs.

Working with various agriculturalists and producers of insect-based products around the country, he said the goal is not just to raise awareness of the benefits of incorporating insects into a balanced, omnivorous diet, but to produce a picture-based Farming Insects Guide that can be distributed and used around the world.

Via their Seeds of Action organization (seedsofaction.com) and #BugsEndHunger campaign, and in partnership with Little Herds (littleherds.org), Connor and his wife, Naomi, said they hope to be part of a dietary change not just in developing nations, but at home as well.

While Naomi and the children arent consuming insects to the degree Jeremy is, their 12-year-old son did request an insect-infused cake for his birthday Saturday.

Its all part, Jeremy said, of conquering the ick factor, making insects just another element of a balanced diet, rather than something to be eaten on a dare, and something that can be farmed worldwide to support families not just nutritionally but economically as well.

Its definitely fear of the unknown and this perception that bugs are gross, and all the negative connotations with them, explained Wendy Lu McGill, founder of Rocky Mountain Micro Ranch (rmmr.co) in Denver, at which she and her business partner, Kyle Conrad, farm crickets. Increasingly, you find more people who say things like, I know this is really important, I know this is sustainable, I know this is valuable nutritionally, but its not for me until I have to.

Even with attention increasingly being given to eating insects On Eating Insects, a book exploring the science, culture, ethics and gastronomy of it, was released Monday theres a revulsion toward insects in western culture that dates back millennia, said David George Gordon, a Seattle chef and author of The Eat-a-Bug Cookbook.

As soon as (western) culture got into agriculture, instead of hunting and gathering, insects became a pain in the neck, Gordon said. They ate the grain, they ruined crops. We fought them and our first instinct became to kill them. But my own perspective is we really need bugs to keep the planet functioning.

A 2013 United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization report (fao.org/docrep/018/i3253e/i3253e.pdf) on entomophagy, or the practice of eating insects, cited insects as part of traditional diets for more than 2 billion people worldwide.

According to the report, insects provide food at low environmental cost, contribute positively to livelihoods, and play a fundamental role in nature. However, these benefits are largely unknown to the public. Contrary to popular belief, insects are not merely famine foods eaten in times of food scarcity or when purchasing and harvesting conventional foods becomes difficult; many people around the world eat insects out of choice, largely because of the palatability of the insects and their established place in local food cultures.

Many involved in entomophagy, including Gordon and McGill, acknowledge that the western diet including its bags of potato chips and its sugar-laden processed foods has to a degree become the aspirational diet worldwide, so in a lot of countries that traditionally have eaten insects, they think of that as bush food, or for old weirdos, Gordon said. Theyd rather be eating Colonel Sanders, so theres actually been a kind of die-off of traditional ways.

McGill said that because hunger is a multi-faced, multi-dimensional problem with causes, and thus solutions, that can vary from region to region, a facet of combating it might be the addition and normalization of insects in the western diet.

We arent culturally inclined to distinguish between good insects and bad insects, wrote anthropologist Krystal DCosta in a 2013 blog post for Scientific American. And I dont know that we care to make this distinction. Insects are different theyre like miniature monsters with their antennae and pincers and multiple appendages. By casting them all as bad, theyre easier to deal with.

Its the Fear Factor problem, Jeremy Connor said: People grow up daring each other to eat bugs. Its a horrifying, gag-inducing rite of passage. And even with increased efforts to normalize and promote insects as part of a balanced diet, theyre still a novelty item when they show up on menus, a bragging right and badge of honor when consumed.

But they could be just dinner. Or part of it, Connor said.

Consider his May 1 meals, the first of his monthlong experiment and focusing on the cuisine of regions in Central America and the Caribbean that consistently deal with food insecurity and hunger: Breakfast was potatoes with crickets. Lunch was mayi moulin ak paw, a Haitian dish with cornmeal, coconut milk and kidney beans, to which Connor added mealworm powder (mealworms being not actually worms, but beetle larva).

Dinner was black beans, rice and fresh salsa with 1/3 cup of whole roasted crickets, plus white corn tortillas.

The crickets in his breakfast alone provided him with 14 grams of protein, but its not just protein, he said. Insects can provide so many more nutrients than just protein, including iron, calcium, riboflavin and niacin.

He suggested that insect powders might provide the gateway for many people, something they can sprinkle in their smoothies and begin to normalize the idea of consuming insects for those who have not traditionally done so.

And for those who have, Connors goal is to create strategic relationships worldwide, offering people the support, education and means to safely and productively farm insects so that they can not only provide for their families, but sell the surplus and work toward economic independence.

He and Naomi are documenting his monthlong journey with a daily vlog on their website, and though Im doing it as a campaign this month, I feel like our family is transitioning as a lifestyle, he said. At the end, I feel like (eating insects) will be a part of our life.

It starts, then, one bug at a time.

Odicil earchilignis reperest que con plabo. Ehendicia sinulla nihitatur, id maximil itectorum rempor autecatem sam eaquo quam exerchil inctat doles et, nimodis vidus eost praeperitat autemquo conserum, et et et lab ipideli cimus, id quistin conse elenisc iaesequas velique ipsae cum ad exped ut quam res ut voluptibus re voluptas ma qui cum eosam, cusa que volor assed eictis sitatur? Qui arum et od et liatur?

Gende latus. Ant, quod que labori aut eossum inverfe rferferibus es volendit porem ducia cupitasitia consequo inumquost eritinveris dent es asinverrum ellab iur ad essin raepelestem volendandae disquo eum lam non necturior amenia volorestio oditiore cum quiatiam, quuntur aut resequiam natiam quo blatior repelit, quistiis sunditius, quos pro odigenit apic temquia voluptas quis volorro tenis mintiori comniendus mo to quas conectatios sequi asperum volendae sa quis ate con pres aut magnist, ut voluptatem fugiand elitate stionse ndaerum isciis con cum aut elest lab iur, cor aut earum doluptatet aut etur aut earum dolesti atiume doluptatur, odi ut ad eturionseni suscitatis maiore, natur molut aciis et et faccaborit as delendendi odicia in re comnis doloribus, que porios dolorup tatem. Cerovitat delent qui od mo et vellit et occat laccum nobit, sequidi psuntoreped excea sitatinctem et labores aut la comnis alitis nonsectur serchic te ma volorepernam que qui alibus porit quae nonsequi dolora sunt.

Cipid que pos acculpa cum res quo vollacepe nimi, odia dolum solupta quo voluptas incium nisciis et quamus quas autecea qui dios mi, ium dus, aut rae lacepudio vitatur, incto exceptatust eum, quatiur? Iquist ex et occum facearc iendeni eniminihicim cons Odicil earchilignis reperest que con plabo. Ehendicia sinulla nihitatur, id maximil itectorum rempor autecatem sam eaquo quam exerchil inctat doles et, nimodis vidus eost praeperitat autemquo conserum, et et et lab ipideli cimus, id quistin conse elenisc iaesequas velique ipsae cum ad exped ut quam res ut voluptibus re voluptas ma qui cum eosam, cusa que volor assed eictis sitatur? Qui arum et od et liatur?

Gende latus. Ant, quod que labori aut eossum inverfe rferferibus es volendit porem ducia cupitasitia consequo inumquost eritinveris dent es asinverrum ellab iur ad essin raepelestem volendandae disquo eum lam non necturior amenia volorestio oditiore cum quiatiam, quuntur aut resequiam natiam quo blatior repelit, quistiis sunditius, quos pro odigenit apic temquia voluptas quis volorro tenis mintiori comniendus mo to quas conectatios sequi asperum volendae sa quis ate con pres aut magnist, ut voluptatem fugiand elitate stionse ndaerum isciis con cum aut elest lab iur, cor aut earum doluptatet aut etur aut earum dolesti atiume doluptatur, odi ut ad eturionseni suscitatis maiore, natur molut aciis et et faccaborit as delendendi odicia in re comnis doloribus, que porios dolorup tatem. Cerovitat delent qui od mo et vellit et occat laccum nobit, sequidi psuntoreped excea sitatinctem et labores aut la comnis alitis nonsectur serchic te ma volorepernam que qui alibus porit quae nonsequi dolora sunt.

Cipid que pos acculpa cum res quo vollacepe nimi, odia dolum solupta quo voluptas incium nisciis et quamus quas autecea qui dios mi, ium dus, aut rae lacepudio vitatur, incto exceptatust eum, quatiur? Iquist ex et occum facearc iendeni eniminihicim cons

Continue reading here:
Bug bites - Grand Junction Daily Sentinel

In favor of vaccines – Amandala

Posted: May 7, 2017 at 12:42 am

Dear Sir, George and Candy Gonzalez make all sorts of misleading statements in their letter last week (Fri 28th). It would take a very long time to address each point, but let me reply to a few. First, whilst acknowledging the fact that any medical intervention has risks, the science is clear: vaccines are safe and effective, and adverse side effects are rare. In fact, and more importantly, NOT vaccinating your child has more risk!

Secondly,though there are more vaccinations than ever before, todays vaccines are far more efficient. Small children are actually exposed to fewer immunologic components overall than children in past decades.

Thirdly, the type of mercury found in thimerosal, ethylmercury, differs from methylmercury, the type commonly found in fish and known to be harmful in large amounts. Ethylmercury, is broken down and excreted from the body much more quickly than methylmercury, and no scientific study has found a link between ethylmercury and autism or any other harmful effects. With respect to formaldehyde, research shows there is 50 to 70 times more formaldehyde present in an average newborns body than in a single dose of vaccine. In brief, current science shows formaldehyde in vaccines to be harmless. And where aluminumis concerned, it is the third most common naturally-occurring element, after oxygen and silicon. It is found in plants, soil, air, and water. A breast-fed infant will naturally ingest around 7 milligrams of aluminum in her diet throughout the first six months of her life. In contrast, the standard vaccines administered over the first six months of an infants life contain an average of just 4.4 milligrams of aluminum. Aluminum has been used safely for over six decades in vaccines, with no scientific evidence indicating otherwise.

Fourth, yes, the US passed the 1986 which gave vaccine manufacturers immunity, for good reasons at the time. This does not mean you cannot receive compensation for adverse effects, and indeed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has paid over US$3 billion (up to 2012). Between 1988 to 2008- 925 claims were compensated a very, very small number of the children actually vaccinated in that same period.

The science is open, available and comprehensive with respect to vaccines, and I encourage everyone to read and educate themselves on the matter. But just like climate change, there is a minority of loud voices that lead an anti-vaccine campaign based on fear and bad science and it is dangerous for every child.

Yours Sincerely, Steve Heighway Equally Concerned About All Children

More here:
In favor of vaccines - Amandala

On the Society diet, you live on hors d’oeurves – The Daily Advertiser

Posted: May 7, 2017 at 12:41 am

Kris Wartelle Society & Causes Reporter(Photo: The Advertiser)Buy Photo

I started wondering about diets lately.

By wondering, I mean, wondering why everyone else is on one and Im not. I probably should be. Most everyone I know is on one of the following: The Caveman diet (they call it Paleo but I call it caveman). They can only eat meat and lettuce. I tried this once. I think I lasted a full day but I really dont remember. It could have been just half of that. There's the Green-only cleansing diet. I have several friends doing this. I have no idea what that entails, but I assume it is the same diet as above only without the animals(or meat). Anything green is cool.

Im good with that for the most part. Once, I ate only orange stuff all day. Not on purpose, it just turned out that carrots, oranges and Diet Sunkist were the only things I had handy. Dont ask me why thats not a real diet. If there is a green-only regimen, why cant there be an orange one? My guess is because people would figure out that Cheetos and cheese crackers are also orange and that would wreck everything. Who knows?

Daughter No. 1is always saying she cant eat anything white. Bread, rice, pasta, all that is a no. Id have to rule that one out because Im sure white chocolate would not be allowed, andthe minute you tell me I cant have it, all Id want is that.

Daughter No. 2became a vegetarian, but that was after she became a vegan. She went through that one in high school and it nearly killed me. There are only so many frozen, black bean veggie burgers with no animal broth added that one can consume. Andshe considered kale a necessity. Kale that we bought, but never figured out how to make properly. So, then it became brown kale. Brown stuff was not allowed on someones diet, but I cant remember which one.

I probably could start my own diet plan. Wed call it the Society diet. You know, it would sort of remind you of the Hollywood diet. If you follow the Society diet, you basically survive on hors doeurves and wine or whatever cocktail you like when you go out.

This diet also reminds me of the movie "Mermaids" with Cher and Winona Ryder.Remember that scene where she cant make any real food at home because she only knows how to make hors doeuvers? She even has to cut her kids sandwiches into little stars. I totally get that now.

Sugar is allowed on the Society diet because, well, it is in almost everything and it is impolite to turn it down in some circles.

Then,during Lent and the months of June and July, you dont go out at all and youlive on salad and vitamin water. That pretty much makes up for the rest of the year.

Im kidding, of course. Please dont try this at home unless you are a highly trained professional.

I think I prefer Ms. Ella Meaux's diet. She retired from Borden's after 56 years, at the age of 86. She said sheate ice cream every day. All I cansay is,Ms. Ella,whatever you did, it worked, so carry on!

Read or Share this story: http://www.theadvertiser.com/story/life/luxury-living/2017/05/05/society-diet-you-live-hors-doeurves/101295590/

View original post here:
On the Society diet, you live on hors d'oeurves - The Daily Advertiser

People actually tried the Victoria’s Secret pre-show diet and it went horribly – The indy100

Posted: May 7, 2017 at 12:41 am

The Victorias Secret Fashion Show is a yearly spectacle. But while it may look easythe preparation sounds impossible.

YouTubers Candace Lowry and Michelle Khare tried the diet Victorias Secret models do leading up to the fashion show. They did two days of the models typical diet," recommended by their dietician, and then two days of the liquid diet theyre also allegedlydo.

For this, Lowry says the models do nine full days of just having protein smoothies, egg whites,a gallon of water, and work out twice a day. So thats what they did.

Day one started off with a promising combination of Oatmeal and eggwhites, fruit and greek yogurt. A lot of workouts and salads followed. And then, just liquids.

Khare said:

I am tired, just really really tired, because on this Victoria's Secret diet I can't really eat the things I want to eat. After I train I want to reward myself and instead I'm cooking vegetables right now as a snack. I guess that's the life of a model.

After the diet, she said:

The first two days, which were the regular diet days, were very manageable.

Lowry added:

Then, days three and four (egg whites and liquids only) , I had no energy.

Khare said:

It was really about survival. I had trouble sleeping too, because I was so hungry. It doesn't feel sustainable. It's not a healthy way to lose weight. No one, as a regular person, would go through this. And the models are supposed to represent thepeople buying the clothes, who are regular people.

Here's the video:

More: This model only ate 500 calories a day while working. Now she's shared what she looks like after giving it up

See the article here:
People actually tried the Victoria's Secret pre-show diet and it went horribly - The indy100

Weight-Loss Procedure Makes Stomach into ‘Accordion’ Without Surgery – Live Science

Posted: May 7, 2017 at 12:41 am

CHICAGO A new, nonsurgical weight-loss procedure which involves inserting a tube down a patient's throat and suturing the stomach is safe and effective, a new study finds.

During the procedure, which is called endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, doctors insert a long tube down a patient's esophagus to the stomach. Then, they sew "pleats" into the stomach, which makes it resemble an accordion.

The procedure reduces the volume of the stomach, so that patients feel fuller faster and therefore eat less, said lead study author Dr. Reem Sharaiha, an assistant professor at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City. Sharaiha presented her findings here today (May 6) at Digestive Disease Week, a scientific meeting focused on digestive diseases. [The Science of Weight Loss]

Because the procedure is "endoscopic," and thus does not involve cutting through the abdomen, the procedure is not considered surgical.

The new procedure could be a good option for people who are obese, meaning they have a BMI of 30 or higher, who either cannot undergo weight-loss surgery due to medical conditions or do not want to have surgery, Sharaiha said during a news conference in advance of her presentation. The procedure is not intended to replace other weight-loss surgery options, but rather to offer an additional, "safe and reliable, cost-effective" option, she said.

In the study, which has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, Sharaiha and her co-authors compared the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to two options for weight loss that do involve surgery: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic banding.

Both of those operations involve making small incisions in a person's abdomen to allow surgeons to reach the stomach. During a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, surgeons cut away a large portion of the stomach, making the organ smaller and sleeve-shaped. During a laparoscopic banding operation, surgeons wrap a band around the upper portion of the stomach (rather than cutting the organ), so that only a smaller section of the stomach is left to carry out its functions.

The new study examined 91 patients who underwent the endoscopic procedure, 120 patients who had laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and 67 patients who had a laparoscopic banding operation, Sharaiha said during the press conference.

One year later, the researchers found that the patients who had the endoscopic procedure had lost, on average, nearly 18 percent of their body weight, while laparoscopic sleeve patients lost an average of nearly 30 percent of their body weight and laparoscopic banding patients lost an average of more than 14 percent of their body weight.

The endoscopic sleeve patients lost less weight than the laparoscopic sleeve patients but had a much lower rate of complications: 1 percent compared with 10 percent, Sharaiha said. In addition, endoscopic sleeve patients were able to leave the hospital the same day of the procedure, she said. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients in the hospital for about three days, on average, after the operation, and laparoscopic banding patients stayed in the hospital for a day and half, on average, after the operation.

The endoscopic procedure also cost less than the laparoscopic sleeve procedure, according to the study. The endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty cost, on average, $12,000, while the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy cost $22,000 on average. The laparoscopic banding operation cost $15,000 on average.

Sharaiha noted that most the patients who underwent the endoscopic procedure had to pay out of pocket, while insurance usually covered the other operations. It's possible that this affected the results, as previous studies have shown that people are more adherent to weight-loss guidelines if the individuals need to pay for the procedures themselves, Sharaiha added.

Originally published on Live Science.

See the rest here:
Weight-Loss Procedure Makes Stomach into 'Accordion' Without Surgery - Live Science

Significant Improvement in Glycemic Control With Weight Loss Intervention – Monthly Prescribing Reference (registration)

Posted: May 7, 2017 at 12:41 am

May 06, 2017

Baseline average in the phentermine group was 229.6lbs vs. 209.7lbs in the OPTIFAST group

This article is written live from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) 2017 Annual Meeting in Austin, TX. MPR will be reporting news on the latest findings from leading experts in endocrinology. Check back for more news from AACE 2017.

A medically supervised weight loss program over 6 months led to a significant improvement in glycemic control, presented Jonathan Allen, MS, RD, from the North Florida Regional Thyroid Center, at the AACE 2017 Annual Meeting.

The rise of obesity over the past 40 years has brought with it a significant rise in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes, carrying health, financial, and social burdens. A loss of 5% of body weight has demonstrated significant improvements in blood pressure, lipid levels (eg, HDL, triglycerides), and blood sugar. A loss of 1015% of body weight has also demonstrated a higher likelihood of achieving health improvements.

Weight loss recommendations start with an initial lifestyle modification, including improved dietary intake and more physical activity. Medication therapy is also available for patients who have severe comorbidities as are medically supervised meal replacement programs when major dietary interventions are warranted.

Allen and colleagues conducted a retrospective study to assess phentermine and the OPTIFAST diet program on weight and diabetes outcomes at 6 months. They reviewed 15 patients who completed treatment with phentermine and 6 patients who completed 6 months of the OPTIFAST program with HbA1c >6%. At baseline, the average in the phentermine group was 229.6lbs vs. 209.7lbs in the OPTIFAST group.

The analysis showed a significant effect on HbA1c where phentermine therapy led to a 0.06% increase vs. a 1.8% decrease with OPTIFAST (P<0.001). There was a 50.3lbs (17.9%) decrease in weight among phentermine patients vs. 13.6lbs (6.0%) decrease in weight among the OPTIFAST patients. Moreover, one-third of the patients in the phentermine group had a decrease in antidiabetic medications and all participants in the OPTIFAST decreased antidiabetic medications by 50% or discontinued completely.

In general, improved glycemic control was seen following a 6-month, medically supervised meal replacement weight loss program. "Despite reduced or discontinued diabetes medication, sustained weight loss promotes improvements in long-term blood glucose control," concluded Allen.

For continuous endocrine news coverage from the AACE 2017 Annual Meeting, check back to MPR'sAACE pagefor the latest updates.

Original post:
Significant Improvement in Glycemic Control With Weight Loss Intervention - Monthly Prescribing Reference (registration)

Verify: Is tequila good for you? – KVUE

Posted: May 7, 2017 at 12:40 am

Verify: Is tequila good for you?

Dana Thiede, KARE 7:21 PM. CDT May 06, 2017

Stock Image (Photo: KARE)

In recent days, we've noticed posts and videos popping up on social media touting the medicinal benefits of the clear liquor, saying it helps you sleep, lose weight, and can even cure a common cold. Question is, are those claims true, or a hearty shot of hyperbole?

To answer the question "Is tequila good for you?" KARE11's Cory Hepola talked to two expert sources: Simeon Phelps, Beverage Director for the popular Nico's Taco and Tequila Bar in Minneapolis as well asAllina Health Dietician Elizabeth Vander Laan.

Phelps brought up agave, a cactus varietal that is the main ingredient in tequila. Some experts tout its ability to replace sugars, aiding in weight loss. Agave's anti-inflammatoryand immune-boosting properties have also been cited, and the website sheknows.com claims the Aztecs used agave syrup to treat wounds because of its antibacterial properties. Three years ago, the American Chemical Society did report that a sweetener created from the agave plant could help certain people with diabetes lose weight.

So if tequila is made of agave it has to be good for you, right? Not so much, said Vander Laan.

"There's not even that type of sugar left in it because it's fermented out," Vander Laan said, talking about the process of distilling agave into tequila.

Does it really help you sleep?

"It's a depressant, so it might help you actually get to sleep, but I'm not sure it's that restful sleep," asserted Vander Haan. The National Sleep Foundation agrees, saying alcohol interrupts your circadian rhythm, blocks REM sleep and can aggravate breathing problems.

How about weight loss? "An ounce and a half of hard alcohol is about 80 calories," says Vander Haan, not even mentioning the sweet, caloric stuff tequila is frequently mixed with.

And that whole dead about curing colds? "They used to use it back in the 30's, back when you could order all sorts of crazy things for the Sears catalog, right? No, there's no evidence to support that," Vander Haan insisted.

At this point, we can safely say KARE 11 has verified that tequila is NOT good for you, despite some of the claims you may have seen on social media. Vander Laandoes say that moderate alcohol use of any variety may have some positive heart benefits for some, but alcohol is also hard on your liver, increases the risk of certain cancers, and can be addictive.

If you're going to drink tequila this Cinco de Mayo, Vander Haan says to do it in moderation, and if you're not a tequila drinker.... don't start swilling it for your health.

VERIFY SOURCES:

Elizabeth Vander Haan, Dietician, Allina Health Systems

Simeon Phelps, Beverage Director,Nico's Taco and Tequila Bar

Help our journalists VERIFY the news.Do you know someone else we should interview for this story? Did we miss anything in our reporting? Is there another story you'd like us to VERIFY?Click here.

2017 KARE-TV

Here is the original post:
Verify: Is tequila good for you? - KVUE

How to boost your metabolism: Burn more calories with these simple tricks – Express.co.uk

Posted: May 7, 2017 at 12:40 am

GETTY

Or maybe youve hit your 40s and are now struggling to keep your waistline in check (when in the past you could eat what you wanted without gaining a pound).

Both are common problems and the natural response for many is to blame it on a slow metabolism.

Its common for people to think there must be something wrong with their metabolism if theyre struggling with their weight, says dietitian Juliette Kellow.

But while everyones metabolic rate the speed at which we burn calories varies and does start to drop as we get older, its important not to fall into the trap of automatically thinking its the main reason for piling on the pounds or battling to stay slim.

Dr Thomas Barber, an obesity expert and associate professor in clinical endocrinology at the University of Warwick, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, agrees.

Only a small minority of obese patients have an underlying condition contributing to a slow metabolism, he says.

So the majority of us have no excuse to blame our excess weight on a slow metabolism but that doesnt mean there arent things we can do to give it a boost. Heres how:

GETTY

In theory, every time we eat we enhance our metabolism. Everyones metabolism goes up for two to three hours after any meal because of the extra metabolic processes required to digest food and absorb its nutrients, explains Dr Barber.

The key to keeping your metabolism fired up is to space meals out

Juliette Kellow, dietitian

Its one of the many reasons experts recommend eating regularly and not skipping meals. Going for long amounts of time without eating means your body thinks its about to be faced with a famine, so your metabolism slows down in preparation for this, adds Juliette.

The key to keeping your metabolism fired up is to space meals out regularly throughout the day, so you benefit from the calories burned through digesting and absorbing meals.

Thats not to say you should constantly graze. Relentless munching and mindless eating can mean a stack of calories far more than even a stoked metabolism can burn off, with the result that the weight piles on.

GETTY

Certain foods, such as chillies, are associated with a heightened thermogenic effect (the amount of calories needed to process the food weve eaten), explains Dr Barber.

Other foods, including ginger, pepper, grapefruit, coffee and green tea, have also been linked to speeding up our metabolism. However its unlikely eating these foods alone will affect weight.

Positive findings are usually too insignificant to conclude eating X or Y food will burn more calories, Dr Barber confirms.

Getty Images

1 of 11

So enjoy them as part of a healthy, balanced diet but remember that eating them in excess wont help you lose weight.

Include protein-rich foods lean meat, fish, poultry, eggs, tofu and Quorn, for example at each meal.

Studies show protein-rich foods cause a 20-30 per cent rise in metabolic rate compared with just a 5-10 per cent increase for carbs and less than three per cent for fat.

One study found a high-protein, low-fat diet produced double the fat burning effects of a high-carb, low-fat diet.

A study published this February compared a group of people eating wholegrains with a group who ate refined white grains.

After six weeks, the researchers found those in the wholegrain group passed more stools with a higher calorie content and had a slightly higher BMR (basal metabolic rate) than those in the refined white grains group.

After adjusting for other factors, the average daily loss for the wholegrain group was 92 calories a day.

More studies are needed to confirm these findings and identify whether this is an effective way to boost our BMR.

But we already know wholegrains provide good amounts of fibre (we should aim for 30g a day) and are associated with a number of other health benefits, including a reduced risk of bowel cancer.

So choose brown rice or pasta, wholemeal bread, wholegrain cereals and oats if they boost our metabolism, even better.

It may not be what we eat but how we eat it that has an impact on how many calories we burn.

In one study, adults who ate a meal over 10 minutes burned 30 calories.

When they ate the identical meal on a separate day over 40 minutes they burned 81 calories. Slowing down also gives the brain the time it needs to receive the Im full message from the stomach and helps to keep us fuller for longer, which reduces the amount we eat.

Getty Images

1 of 11

How to lose weight without going to the gym

Eat each meal slowly and give it your full attention that means no television, smartphones, computer screens or other distractions.

Take your time chewing and put your cutlery down between mouthfuls.

Crash dieting and extreme calorie reductions slow metabolism as our body thinks food is in short supply and so responds by conserving energy exactly the opposite to what we want to achieve when were trying to lose weight.

In times of starvation (which is effectively what happens with a crash diet), the body starts to break down muscle as well as fat to provide it with the calories it needs to function.

This is bad news for our metabolism because the less muscle we have, the slower our metabolic rate and the fewer calories we burn.

Then, when we go back to eating normally, a slower metabolism means we dont need as many calories as before, so we pile weight on more quickly.

Instead, follow a healthy eating plan which reduces calories slightly and exercise regularly to burn calories and strengthen muscle.

GETTY

The benefits of exercise are two-fold. First, aerobic activities such as running, cycling and brisk walking increase the amount of calories we burn.

Plus, aerobic exercise can lead to the afterburn effect, where the body continues to burn calories faster for many hours.

Strength training also helps to build lean muscle. Muscular activity is a very good way of burning calories and enhancing metabolic rate, says Dr Barber.

The more muscle we have, the higher our BMR. Exercising regularly is even more important as we age.

By the time we are in our 30s, our body starts to lose muscle and the more inactive we are, the faster this happens.

The full version of this article appears in the May edition of Healthy Food Guide.

Read the original post:
How to boost your metabolism: Burn more calories with these simple tricks - Express.co.uk

Nutrition myths debunked – Sequoyah County Times

Posted: May 6, 2017 at 12:42 am

We had 10 ladies attend our meeting this week. Shirley was our biggest loser with 3.4 pounds lost this week. Keep up the great work Shirley. We had a net loss of 6 pounds this week. Doing great ladies!

Our Yes-Yes for the week is to eat an apple a day to keep the doctor away.

Our program was on Nutrition Myths Debunked. Examples of weight loss myths are Fad diets work, skipping meals help promote weight loss, carbohydrates are fattening, eating at night will cause weight loss, and eating less than 1,000 calories will help lose weight for good. Reality checks proved these to be myths.

Our leaders challenge this coming week is become a diet myth sleuth. Identify any advertisement that seems too good to be true. This can be from a magazine, television, the internet, etc. Make a list of reasons why the diet advertised will not work in the long term. Then, identify healthy ways to lose weight. Weight loss takes hard work and motivation.

The two-bit jar weekly contest was won by Laura.

We started our May Flower contest tonight. We receive a flower petal for every half-pound we lose. Who will get their flowerpot full of flowers first? Lets go girls.

We are preparing for State Recognition Day in Tulsa May 4-6, at the Southern Hills Marriott on 71st Street. We will meet at Cornerstone Tabernacle to carpool to Tulsa.

We would love to get to know you. You are welcome to join us in getting healthy by contacting Billie at 918-489-2155 or Shirley at 918-571-3353. Or, drop in on Thursday evenings at the Cornerstone Tabernacle at 401 W. 8th St., Gore. We meet from 5 to 7 p.m. Looking forward to meeting you. Billie.

Continue reading here:
Nutrition myths debunked - Sequoyah County Times

Oakland A’s Open Peanut-Free Seating Section For Games – CBS San Francisco Bay Area

Posted: May 6, 2017 at 12:41 am


CBS San Francisco Bay Area
Oakland A's Open Peanut-Free Seating Section For Games
CBS San Francisco Bay Area
But for some people, peanuts are not part of their day-to-day diet and can do them harm. So we got to pull the peanuts out of baseball for some people. The small section of seating at the Oakland Coliseum will be specially cleaned and maintained to ...

and more »

Read more from the original source:
Oakland A's Open Peanut-Free Seating Section For Games - CBS San Francisco Bay Area


Page 1,577«..1020..1,5761,5771,5781,579..1,5901,600..»